I’m glad there is no minimum length requirement for T-SQL Tuesday blog posts, because this one will be short. I was in the classroom for almost 11 hours today, and I need to be back tomorrow morning at 7:30. Way long ago, back in SQL 2000 (or was it earlier?) when a query indicated that SQL Server was going to use a nonclustered index to get ...

I love SQL Server execution plans. It is often easy to spot the cause of a performance problem just by looking at one. The task is considerably easier if the plan includes run-time information (a so-called ‘actual’ execution plan), but even a compiled plan can be very useful. Nevertheless, there are still times where the execution plan does not ...

I have just published a four-part series for SQLPerformance.com on the Halloween Problem. Some of you will never have heard of this issue, and those that have might associate it only with T-SQL UPDATE queries. In fact, the Halloween problem affects execution plans for INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE and MERGE statements. This is a topic I have been ...

I remember one of the most surprising changes in SQL Server 2000 2005 was how the graphical plans showed the use of a nonclustered index to seek, and the plan included something that looked like a JOIN to find rows in the base table.  Here’s an example. Although I used SQL Server 2008R2, the graphical plan will be pretty similar to what it ...

A MERGE statement can fail, and incorrectly report a unique key violation when: The target table uses a unique filtered index; and No key column of the filtered index is updated; and A column from the filtering condition is updated; and Transient key violations are possible Example Tables Say we have ...

Estimated row counts on key or RID lookups where a filtering predicate is applied can be wrong in SSMS execution plans.  This error does not affect the optimizer’s ultimate plan selection, but it does look odd.  There are other cases where estimated row counts are inconsistent (for defensible reasons) but the behaviour shown in this post ...

Given a partitioned table and a simple SELECT query that compares the partitioning column to a single literal value, why does SQL Server read all the partitions when it seems obvious that only one partition needs to be examined? Sample Data The following script creates a table, partitioned on the char(3) column ‘Div’, and populates it with ...

The humble Compute Scalar is one of the least well-understood of the execution plan operators, and usually the last place people look for query performance problems.  It often appears in execution plans with a very low (or even zero) cost, which goes some way to explaining why people ignore it. Some readers will already know that a Compute ...

Ask anyone what the primary advantage of temporary tables over table variables is, and the chances are they will say that temporary tables support statistics and table variables do not.  This is true, of course; even the indexes that enforce PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints on table variables do not have populated statistics associated with ...

Summary: A deep dive into SQL Server parallelism, and a potential performance problem with parallel plans that use TOP. There was an interesting question asked by Mark Storey-Smith on dba.stackexchange.com back in October 2011.  He was looking at the execution plan for a query that counts a million rows from a virtual auxiliary table of ...