<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'SQL Server 2005' and 'product lifecycle'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=SQL+Server+2005,product+lifecycle&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'SQL Server 2005' and 'product lifecycle'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>A quick note about the end of SQL Server 2005 mainstream support</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/01/11/a-quick-note-about-sql-server-2005.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:32520</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In a previous &lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2010/12/17/sql-server-2005-sp4-is-here.aspx" title="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2010/12/17/sql-server-2005-sp4-is-here.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;blog post about Service Pack 4&lt;/a&gt;, I said the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;"...from this point forward all you're likely to see are cumulative updates to the SP3 and SP4 branches and, roughly a year from today, mainstream support will only need to maintain the SP4 branch.&amp;nbsp; You can read more about this in the following blog post from the CSS blog:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2010/02/17/mainstream-vs-extended-support-and-sql-server-2005-sp4-can-someone-explain-all-of-this.aspx" title="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2010/02/17/mainstream-vs-extended-support-and-sql-server-2005-sp4-can-someone-explain-all-of-this.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Mainstream vs Extended Support and SQL Server 2005 SP4: Can someone explain all of this?&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; In that post, I focused on these words in the product lifecycle chart:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;"Support ends 12 months after the next service pack..."&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And completely ignored the rest of the sentence, which reads: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;"...or at the end of the product's support lifecycle, whichever comes first." &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure enough, the end of mainstream support for the base product is April 12, 2011, and since this is earlier than December of 2011, this is what we get.&amp;nbsp; What does it mean?&amp;nbsp; Well, you can expect probably one more cumulative update for SQL Server 2005 SP4, and possibly one more cumulative update for SQL Server 2005 SP3.&amp;nbsp; After that, it will be out of support unless you have an explicit support contract set up - any fixes that aren't security-related will require a service agreement.&amp;nbsp; Extended support for 2005 SP3 will end in December of 2011, and extended support for SP4 will last until April of 2016.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm pointing this out because it was made clear in a &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2011/01/10/sql-server-7-0-she-sure-was-a-good-ship.aspx" title="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2011/01/10/sql-server-7-0-she-sure-was-a-good-ship.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;recent CSS blog post&lt;/a&gt;, but the post was about SQL Server 7.0, so you may have missed it.&amp;nbsp; And the &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/search/default.aspx?sort=PN&amp;amp;alpha=SQL+Server&amp;amp;Filter=FilterNO" title="http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/search/default.aspx?sort=PN&amp;amp;alpha=SQL+Server&amp;amp;Filter=FilterNO" target="_blank"&gt;product lifecycle table for SQL Server&lt;/a&gt; has not been updated for SQL Server 2005 SP4.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Big thanks to Chris Wood who pointed this out to me this morning - I had missed it too. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>