<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'SQL Azure' and 'SaaS'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=SQL+Azure,SaaS&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'SQL Azure' and 'SaaS'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>SQL Azure - hands on</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_nielsen/archive/2009/09/21/sql-azure-first-look.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:16917</guid><dc:creator>Paul Nielsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;P style="MARGIN:0in 0in 10pt;" class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri&gt;As I’ve blogged before, I like the concept of cloud database services. I think that SQL Azure is the right direction. I’ve also blogged that I’m starting a CRM SaaS software startup company. My original business plan had SQL Azure as the hosting service. I like the built-in redundancy and availability.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="MARGIN:0in 0in 10pt;" class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri&gt;Last week I took the SQL Azure CTP for a test-drive. It took me about 2 hours to fix all the incompatibilities with my code, and move my test database to SQL Azure. And Wow it’s very,&lt;FONT color=#cc0000&gt; &lt;I style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"&gt;very&lt;/I&gt; fast&lt;/FONT&gt;. Did I mention that it’s fast? &lt;STRONG&gt;I really like SQL Azure.&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="MARGIN:0in 0in 10pt;" class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri&gt;But, sometimes tech decisions need to be driven by business realities. I’ve been crunching numbers and for my business model, SQL Azure is just too expensive. I can buy some nice Dell servers and pay for co-location in downtown Colorado Springs that will have dual power grids and connections to three different internet backbones in the same building for ½ to 1/3 of what SQL Azure costs. As a disclaimer, I intend to host several 5-25 Gb databases&amp;nbsp;each with&amp;nbsp;only a few&amp;nbsp;users, which makes it more efficient for me to host several databases on a single server than pay for each SQL Azure database. If your business model is different then SQL Azure may make more sense for your bottom line. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="MARGIN:0in 0in 10pt;" class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri&gt;Since I’ve spoken up so loudly for databases in the cloud, I figured it was only fair to report my current thinking on the subject. So while I’ll keep testing SQL Azure, and I think it’s good tech, this startup is sticking with a traditional SQL Server solution until the SQL Azure pricing model fits my business plan. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>