<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'SQL Azure', 'Cloud Computing', and 'Process'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=SQL+Azure,Cloud+Computing,Process&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'SQL Azure', 'Cloud Computing', and 'Process'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>In the Cloud, Everything Costs Money</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2012/07/10/in-the-cloud-everything-costs-money.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:55:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:44239</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been teaching my daughter about budgeting. I’ve explained that most of the time the money coming in is from only one or two sources – and you can only change that from time to time. The money going out, however, is to many locations, and it changes all the time. She’s made a simple debits and credits spreadsheet, and I’m having her research each part of the budget. Her eyes grow wide when she finds out everything has a cost – the house, gas for the lawnmower, dishes, water for showers, food, electricity to run the fridge, a new fridge when that one breaks, everything has a cost. She asked me “how do you pay for all this?” It’s a sentiment many adults have looking at their own budgets – and one reason that some folks don’t even make a budget. It’s hard to face up to the realities of how much it costs to do what we want to do. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;When we design a computing solution, it’s interesting to set up a similar budget, because we don’t always consider all of the costs associated with it. I’ve seen design sessions where the new software or servers are considered, but the “sunk” costs of personnel, networking, maintenance, increased storage, new sizes for backups and offsite storage and so on are not added in. They are already on premises, so they are assumed to be paid for already.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;When you move to a distributed architecture, you'll see more costs directly reflected. Store something, pay for that storage. If the system is deployed and no one is using it, you’re still paying for it. As you watch those costs rise, you might be tempted to think that a distributed architecture costs more than an on-premises one. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;And you might be right – for some solutions. I’ve worked with a few clients where moving to a distributed architecture doesn’t make financial sense – so we didn’t implement it. I still designed the system in a distributed fashion, however, so that when it does make sense there isn’t much re-architecting to do. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In other cases, however, if you consider all of the on-premises costs and compare those accurately to operating a system in the cloud, the distributed system is much cheaper. Again, I never recommend that you take a “here-or-there-only” mentality – I think a hybrid distributed system is usually best – but each solution is different. There simply is no “one size fits all” to architecting a solution.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;As you design your solution, cost out each element. You might find that using a hybrid approach saves you money in one design and not in another. It’s a brave new world indeed. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;So yes, in the cloud, everything costs money. But an on-premises solution also costs money – it’s just that “dad” (the company) is paying for it and we don’t always see it. When we go out on our own in the cloud, we need to ensure that we consider all of the costs. &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Computer books are dead. Well, some of them, anyway.</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2011/05/10/computer-books-are-dead-well-some-of-them-anyway.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 13:58:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:35551</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I read a lot. I mean a LOT. It seems that computer professionals have much in common with medical professionals – we have to read in order to stay on top of our game. For me, this used to mean web sites, magazines, and other print medium, and of course lots of books. I’ve even &lt;a href="http://buckwoody.com/BResume.html#Publications_and_Communications" target="_blank"&gt;written several computer books myself and had them published&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Whenever I teach a class, do a presentation, or hold an architectural design session on a new (or new to that person) technology, they usually follow up with “what’s a good book for learning X technology?” This happens so often that I have a list I keep of the titles I like for a particular subject – &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=2397701323&amp;amp;ref=appd" target="_blank"&gt;you probably have similar book lists&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Windows, SQL Server, and other Microsoft products change on an average of around three or four year cycles. That’s enough time to play with a beta product, wait until it releases, and write a solid book about it, and have that in a decent market for sales, and allow people to read and recommend it. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff" size="3"&gt;Enter “the Cloud” – Distributed Computing.&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Windows Azure and SQL Azure don’t release every three years. Changes – some of them dramatic – release &lt;em&gt;every three or four months&lt;/em&gt;. You can’t even write a book that fast, much less update it that quickly and re-sell it. So what is a technical professional to do?&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Well, although I really like a couple of books I’ve read so far (especially this one, &lt;a href="http://oreilly.com/catalog/0790145308795/" target="_blank"&gt;print and e-book version here&lt;/a&gt;), they are out of date almost by the time they publish. Instead, I rely on blogs, the web, documentation from the vendor and how-to articles published online. Many of these, ironically, are stored, hosted or delivered using – wait for it – Windows Azure. That’s interesting because it’s a medium that describes itself – “reflection”, anyone? &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;This brings up an interesting conundrum. Books have a version, are arranged, thought-out and categorized. Since I’m now getting information off of the web, it’s difficult to figure out whether that material is correct at the time, what level it’s aimed at – and forget about any coherent structure. It’s topic-by-topic. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;So, like most of you, I use links and favorites to arrange things. And I found myself making “virtual books” by essentially creating my own Table-Of-Contents. I’ve shared some of those, &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/11/16/windows-azure-learning-plan.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;such as my Windows and SQL Azure Learning Plan&lt;/a&gt;. The key is that I have to update that to ensure that the latest information is there – otherwise it becomes an organized list that is not authoritative.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Don’t get me wrong – I still have tons of&amp;#160; (e-book format) books, especially on “conceptual” topics like development paradigms and so on. But when it comes to specifics and how-to’s – electronic medium is best for me. It’s more current, adaptable, searchable, interactive and immersive than books. But how long will I retain regular print-type books? We’ll see. Times, they are a changing – fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>