<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'Releases' and 'Opinion'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Releases,Opinion&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'Releases' and 'Opinion'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Product Watch: Scalable SQL Server Grid with XKoto.  Could this be MSSQL's answer to Oracle RAC?</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kevin_kline/archive/2009/02/02/product-watch-scalable-sql-server-grid-with-xkoto-could-this-be-mssql-s-answer-to-oracle-rac.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:11672</guid><dc:creator>KKline</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Microsoft SQL Server has been advancing technologically on every front with each new release.&amp;nbsp; Having spent five years as an Oracle professional (I wrote my first technical book about Oracle) before moving to SQL Server in 1995, I spent a lot of time explaining and sometimes apologizing for the technical limitations in SQL Server when compared to Oracle.&amp;nbsp; With SQL Server 2005, Microsoft finally had a product that required no apologies.&amp;nbsp; This was a product that could scale to multi-terabyte database sizes and could handle tens of thousands of transactions per second.&amp;nbsp;SQL Server could now handle just about anything you threw at it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Despite these innovations,&amp;nbsp;there's still one thing that Oracle has that SQL Server doesn't - &lt;EM&gt;Real Application Clusters &lt;/EM&gt;(RAC).&amp;nbsp; RAC promises that you instantly add new servers to the Oracle cluster, adding their processing power to the cumulative total processing power available for the database application.&amp;nbsp; In a nutshell, RAC promises to deliver seemless scalability and load balancing.&amp;nbsp; (The marketing claims are just that, btw.&amp;nbsp; RAC is not nearly as easy to install, configure, or maintain as it should be.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What if you'd like RAC-like capabilities for your SQL Server environment?&amp;nbsp; Are you out of options?&amp;nbsp; Not with Xkoto's new product called &lt;A class="" title="XKoto's Gridscale Product" href="http://www.xkoto.com/products/"&gt;Gridscale&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Gridscale virtualizes your SQL Server database(s) thereby enabling you to scale them out.&amp;nbsp; As you add more servers, you get more power and improved availability.&amp;nbsp; I've seen a demo presented by several members of the XKoto team and, despite my skepticism, I'm impressed.&amp;nbsp; If you have extreme scalability needs or what to start with a limited amount of power today and scale up later, you should watch &lt;A class="" title="XKoto Gridscale Demo" href="http://www.xkoto.com/sqlvirtualization"&gt;the on-line demo here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As always, I welcome your comments!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Kevin&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>