<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'Planning', 'Developer', 'Design', and 'DBA'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Planning,Developer,Design,DBA&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'Planning', 'Developer', 'Design', and 'DBA'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Tools and Processes for “Fitting it all in”</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2010/01/18/tools-and-processes-for-fitting-it-all-in.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:42:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:21147</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Most data professionals I’ve met work in two modes: we plan for our day, and we react to the situations around us. I’m staring at my list of things that I need to do today right now, which is my planned work. Of course, I have no idea how much of that will really get done – it’s optimistic to be sure. On the other hand I have several systems I manage, and at any moment one of them or the people that interface with them may “change state” such that I need to give them some attention.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;So how do I meld the two? Sometimes it can be quite difficult. I’m constantly working through my list in my mind, re-arranging what I’m focusing on based on what I perceive as the highest need. There are, however, some tools that I use each day to help me manage the workflow.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I use Outlook for tracking everything, since it has a task list (my primary tracking), a calendar, mail and so on. Also I can share the information, it’s on-line so I can see it anywhere, and I can even take it offline onto the plane this week when I fly out of town. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;For the “ad-hoc” work, I rely on a script library, which I keep as SQL Server Management Studio projects. I keep those scripts and projects backed using Microsoft Live Mesh, which synchronizes those files (along with a few other critical files and my IE Favorites) across not only my laptop and primary systems, but even with my Virtual Machines. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Also for my SQL Server systems I use the Standard Reports I’ve blogged about here. I also use Greg Larsen’s Database Dashboard, and a series of PowerShell scripts that work across my systems, alerting me to any problems. Of course I’m using SQL Server Agent Jobs quite a bit, and I also use Alerts and some Perfmon automation for my monthly baselining.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;So – is this your experience as well? Do you get driven by both planned and unplanned work? What tools and processes do you use to keep it all straight with your SQL Server Instances?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Know Your Product Specifications</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2010/01/13/know-your-product-specifications.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:57:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:21010</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As the Data Professional in your organization, the rest of the org looks to you to ensure that the system can handle what the business requires. To do that, you need to know two things: what the business requires, and what SQL Server can do.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;But of course there’s a bit more to it than that. Knowing the business side of the requirements – well, I teach an entire course on that. But knowing what SQL Server can do is something you can find out on your own.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;SQL Server comes in &lt;em&gt;versions&lt;/em&gt;, which are released based on date, and &lt;em&gt;editions&lt;/em&gt;, which are based on features and capabilities. It’s that last part that I want to focus on today.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;As Microsoft SQL Server matures, you’re going to see even more separation between what each edition of SQL Server can do and where it should be used. In the past, most folks have only focused on three editions – Express (the “free” one), Standard, and Enterprise. The rule of thumb was that if Standard was good enough at the moment, put it in. And it is true (and a good thing) that you can upgrade from one edition to another fairly easily.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;But as time goes on, we should spend a little more time understanding what each edition does, what it’s features and capabilities are, and where and when we should put them in. As I study this information, I’ll throw in my 2 cents and you can as well based on what you see. One thing I’ve found so far is that once I have the business requirements, there’s a mix of what I can write in code and what might already be included in a different edition. It’s important to look long and hard at that choice – writing a feature on my own is certainly cheaper in the short term than moving to a “higher” edition, but in some cases it makes sense to let Microsoft handle that lifting.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;These links are ones that you should bookmark and take a peek at periodically. They are the “header” links for more information on those features and capabilities:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;SQL Server 2008: &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143287.aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143287.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;SQL Server 2008 R2: &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143287(SQL.105).aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143287(SQL.105).aspx&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In addition, you might start learning a little more about SQL Azure. I’ll talk more about that later.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>