Search results matching tags 'Design' and 'Tips'

In the Cloud, Everything Costs Money

BuckWoody — Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:55:50 GMT

I’ve been teaching my daughter about budgeting. I’ve explained that most of the time the money coming in is from only one or two sources – and you can only change that from time to time. The money going out, however, is to many locations, and it changes all the time. She’s made a simple debits and credits spreadsheet, and I’m having her research each part of the budget. Her eyes grow wide when she finds out everything has a cost – the house, gas for the lawnmower, dishes, water for showers, food, electricity to run the fridge, a new fridge when that one breaks, everything has a cost. She asked me “how do you pay for all this?” It’s a sentiment many adults have looking at their own budgets – and one reason that some folks don’t even make a budget. It’s hard to face up to the realities of how much it costs to do what we want to do.

When we design a computing solution, it’s interesting to set up a similar budget, because we don’t always consider all of the costs associated with it. I’ve seen design sessions where the new software or servers are considered, but the “sunk” costs of personnel, networking, maintenance, increased storage, new sizes for backups and offsite storage and so on are not added in. They are already on premises, so they are assumed to be paid for already.

When you move to a distributed architecture, you'll see more costs directly reflected. Store something, pay for that storage. If the system is deployed and no one is using it, you’re still paying for it. As you watch those costs rise, you might be tempted to think that a distributed architecture costs more than an on-premises one.

And you might be right – for some solutions. I’ve worked with a few clients where moving to a distributed architecture doesn’t make financial sense – so we didn’t implement it. I still designed the system in a distributed fashion, however, so that when it does make sense there isn’t much re-architecting to do.

In other cases, however, if you consider all of the on-premises costs and compare those accurately to operating a system in the cloud, the distributed system is much cheaper. Again, I never recommend that you take a “here-or-there-only” mentality – I think a hybrid distributed system is usually best – but each solution is different. There simply is no “one size fits all” to architecting a solution.

As you design your solution, cost out each element. You might find that using a hybrid approach saves you money in one design and not in another. It’s a brave new world indeed.

So yes, in the cloud, everything costs money. But an on-premises solution also costs money – it’s just that “dad” (the company) is paying for it and we don’t always see it. When we go out on our own in the cloud, we need to ensure that we consider all of the costs.

Windows Azure End to End Examples

BuckWoody — Tue, 29 May 2012 13:45:59 GMT

I’m fascinated by the way people learn. I’m told there are several methods people use to understand new information, from reading to watching, from experiencing to exploring.

Personally, I use multiple methods of learning when I encounter a new topic, usually starting with reading a bit about the concepts. I quickly want to put those into practice, however, especially in the technical realm. I immediately look for examples where I can start trying out the concepts. But I often want a “real” example – not just something that represents the concept, but something that is real-world, showing some feature I could actually use.

And it’s no different with the Windows Azure platform – I like finding things I can do now, and actually use. So when I started learning Windows Azure, I of course began with the Windows Azure Training Kit – which has lots of examples and labs, presentations and so on. But from there, I wanted more examples I could learn from, and eventually teach others with. I was asked if I would write a few of those up, so here are the ones I use.

CodePlex

CodePlex is Microsoft’s version of an “Open Source” repository. Anyone can start a project, add code, documentation and more to it and make it available to the world, free of charge, using various licenses as they wish. Microsoft also uses this location for most of the examples we publish, and sample databases for SQL Server.

If you search in CodePlex for “Azure”, you’ll come back with a list of projects that folks have posted, including those of us at Microsoft. The source code and documentation are there, so you can learn using actual examples of code that will do what you need. There’s everything from a simple table query to a full project that is sort of a “Corporate Dropbox” that uses Windows Azure Storage.

The advantage is that this code is immediately usable. It’s searchable, and you can often find a complete solution to meet your needs. The disadvantage is that the code is pretty specific – it may not cover a huge project like you’re looking for. Also, depending on the author(s), you might not find the documentation level you want.

Link: http://azureexamples.codeplex.com/site/search?query=Azure&ac=8

Tailspin

Microsoft Patterns and Practices is a group here that does an amazing job at sharing standard ways of doing IT – from operations to coding. If you’re not familiar with this resource, make sure you read up on it. Long before I joined Microsoft I used their work in my daily job – saved a ton of time. It has resources not only for Windows Azure but other Microsoft software as well.

The Patterns and Practices group also publishes full books – you can buy these, but many are also online for free. There’s an end-to-end example for Windows Azure using a company called “Tailspin”, and the work covers not only the code but the design of the full solution. If you really want to understand the thought that goes into a Platform-as-a-Service solution, this is an excellent resource.

The advantages are that this is a book, it’s complete, and it includes a discussion of design decisions. The disadvantage is that it’s a little over a year old – and in “Cloud” years that’s a lot. So many things have changed, improved, and have been added that you need to treat this as a resource, but not the only one. Still, highly recommended.

Link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff728592.aspx

Azure Stock Trader

Sometimes you need a mix of a CodePlex-style application, and a little more detail on how it was put together. And it would be great if you could actually play with the completed application, to see how it really functions on the actual platform.

That’s the Azure Stock Trader application. There’s a place where you can read about the application, and then it’s been published to Windows Azure – the production platform – and you can use it, explore, and see how it performs.

I use this application all the time to demonstrate Windows Azure, or a particular part of Windows Azure.

The advantage is that this is an end-to-end application, and online as well. The disadvantage is that it takes a bit of self-learning to work through.

Links: Learn it: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/bb499684 Use it: https://azurestocktrader.cloudapp.net/

Book Review (Book 11) - Applied Architecture Patterns on the Microsoft Platform

BuckWoody — Tue, 15 May 2012 16:50:34 GMT

This is a continuation of the books I challenged myself to read to help my career - one a month, for year. You can read my first book review here, and the entire list is here. The book I chose for April 2012 was: Applied Architecture Patterns on the Microsoft Platform. I was traveling at the end of last month so I’m a bit late posting this review here.

Why I chose this book:

I actually know a few of the authors on this book, so when they told me about it I wanted to check it out. The premise of the book is exactly as it states in the title - to learn how to solve a problem using products from Microsoft.

What I learned:

I liked the book - a lot. They've arranged the content in a "Solution Decision Framework", that presents a few elements to help you identify a need and then propose alternate solutions to solve them, and then the rationale for the choice. But the payoff is that the authors then walk through the solution they implement and what they ran into doing it.

I really liked this approach. It's not a huge book, but one I've referred to again since I've read it. It's fairly comprehensive, and includes server-oriented products, not things like Microsoft Office or other client-side tools. In fact, I would LOVE to have a work like this for Open Source and other vendors as well - would make for a great library for a Systems Architect. This one is unashamedly aimed at the Microsoft products, and even if I didn't work here, I'd be fine with that. As I said, it would be interesting to see some books on other platforms like this, but I haven't run across something that presents other systems in quite this way.

And that brings up an interesting point - This book is aimed at folks who create solutions within an organization. It's not aimed at Administrators, DBA's, Developers or the like, although I think all of those audiences could benefit from reading it. The solutions are made up, and not to a huge level of depth - nor should they be. It's a great exercise in thinking these kinds of things through in a structured way.

The information is a bit dated, especially for Windows and SQL Azure. While the general concepts hold, the cloud platform from Microsoft is evolving so quickly that any printed book finds it hard to keep up with the improvements.

I do have one quibble with the text - the chapters are a bit uneven. This is always a danger with multiple authors, but it shows up in a couple of chapters. I winced at one of the chapters that tried to take a more conversational, humorous style. This kind of academic work doesn't lend itself to that style.

I recommend you get the book - and use it. I hope they keep it updated - I'll be a frequent customer. :)

Preparation is key to a successful cloud deployment

BuckWoody — Tue, 01 May 2012 13:09:16 GMT

If you want to be wise, watch the actions and outcomes of others. Emulate the successful actions, and avoid the actions that cause failure. That’s true in life in general - and in technology projects in specific.

I’ve worked with several clients who have created or migrated an application to “the cloud” - meaning using Microsoft Windows Azure or another provider. Although the statement in the title of this post is trite, I cannot over-emphasize how accurate it is. In every case of those who had a great experience with a distributed computing environment (which is thankfully the vast majority of my projects),

What kind of preparation do you need to do? Here are some tips I’ve learned in the successful (and not-so-successful) deployments I’ve seen:

Follow standard recommendations for successful projects in general

You and your organization have probably done a few projects before - this one should have the same general attributes: a well-defined goal, a small, motivated team, a realistic timeline, and an adequate budget. I know, I know, you *never* seem to get those things - but if you don’t, you’ll fail. Simple as that.

Educate yourself

Computing technology started out on a single set of hardware for a single purpose - and realizing the limits of the hardware at hand, systems designers quickly realized that scale-out and virtualization was key. No, that’s not new - mainframes almost always worked on the concept of scale-out and virtual machines. But we switched in the 1980’s to single-user systems again, and we’ve been there ever since. By that I mean you install an OS on the things you work on. Now we move back to distributed system concepts, and there are some real differences. You’ll need to learn how those work, and do things a new way. Hey, we’re IT - we LOVE learning new things, right?

Get a partner if needed

There are a few of us white-haired Gandalf’s around that remember how to work in a distributed system, but if it’s new to you, that’s completely OK. You can save yourself a world of trouble by working with someone who’s done this before - a partner you hire, someone from Microsoft Consulting, whatever.

And don’t forget support - who will handle each issue, what is the escalation model, who are your contacts at Microsoft, and what is your “light’s out” strategy?

“A new broom sweeps clean”, the old adage goes, but the old brooms know where the dirt is.

Build a model

Take some time to do a Proof of Concept on your local system and using your Azure hours from your MSDN account if you have one. Going through this build - and being willing to throw it away and try it a different way - is invaluable.

Test your theories

Three statisticians are walking in a field. They see a rabbit - the first guy raises his gun, firing far in front of the rabbit. The second guy simultaneously raises his gun and fires far behind the rabbit. The third guy yells “We got him!”

Not every theory is correct - not every attempt is the right one. Build in your success tests while you’re building your model. Then check them - don’t leave this step out.

Rinse, lather, repeat

This is advice from a shampoo bottle - which I’ve never used (I don’t really have that much hair - especially now). But in a “Cloud” project, it’s important. It’s an evolving system, that gains new improvements at an amazing rate. As soon as you deploy and stabilize you need to start the process over again. If you created your system in a Services model, with contracts for the APIs and abstracted code, this is far easier.

It’s not hard to do a cloud project right. But it’s really simple to do it wrong. Follow these guidelines and you’ll learn from the successes - and mistakes - of others.

“I could use a little help here” or “I can do it myself, thank you” for Cloud Projects

BuckWoody — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:20:55 GMT

Windows Azure allows you to write code in languages within the .NET stack, you can use Java, C++, PHP, NodeJS and others. Code is code - other than keeping things stateless, using a Web or Worker Role in Azure is not all that different from working with an on-premises system.

However….

Working in a scalable, component-based stateless architecture that can use federated security is not all that common for many developers. Some are used to owning the server, scaling up, and state-full paradigms that have a single security domain. Making the transition whilst trying to create a new software application or even port a previous one can be daunting. Sure, we have absolutely tons of free training, kits, videos, online books and more to learn on your own, but some things like architecture can be pivotal as you move along.

So the question is, should you just strike out on your own for a Cloud project, or get Microsoft Consulting Services or another partner to work with you on your first one? I use a few decision points to help guide the projects I assist in.

Note: I’m a huge fan of having help that ends up giving you training and leaves you in charge. If you do engage with someone to help you, make sure you keep this clear and take more and more ownership yourself as the project progresses.

How much time do you have?

Usually the first thing I ask is about the timeline for the project. It doesn’t matter how skilled you are, if you have a short window to get things done it’s better to get help - especially if this is your first cloud project. Having someone that knows the platform well can save you amazing amounts of time. If you have longer, then start with the training in the link above and once you feel confident, jump in.

How complex is the project?

If there are a lot of moving parts, it’s best to engage a partner. The reason is that certain interactions - particularly things like Service Bus or Data Integration - can be quite different than what you may have encountered before.

How many people do you have?

I have a “pizza rule” about projects I’ve used in my career - if it takes over two pizzas to feed everyone on the project, it’s too big and will fail. That being said, one developer and a one-week deadline does not a good project make, usually. It’s best to have at least one architect (or someone in that role) guiding the project along, and at least two developers to work on a cloud project. That’s a generalization of course, since I’ve seen great software on Azure with one developer writing code all by herself, but for more complex projects, more (to a point) is better. The nice thing about bringing on a partner is that you don’t have to hire them full time - they help you and then they go away.

How critical is the project?

There’s no shame in using some help. If the platform is new, if the project is large and complex, and if it is critical to the business, you should engage a partner. That’s regardless of Cloud or anything else - get some help. You don’t want to hit your company’s bottom line in a negative way, but you have to innovate and get them a competitive advantage. Do your research, make sure the partner is qualified to help you, and get it done.

Don’t let these questions scare you off. There are lots of projects you can implement on Windows and SQL Azure with nothing other than the Software Development Kit (SDK) that you get for free with Windows Azure. And assistance comes in many forms - sometimes just phone support, a friend you can ask. Microsoft Consulting Services or any of our great partners. You can get help on just the architecture piece or have them show you how to write the code. They’ll get involved as little or as much as you like.

Application Lifecycle Management Overview for Windows Azure

BuckWoody — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:58:39 GMT

Developing in Windows Azure is at once not that much different from what you’re familiar with in on-premises systems, and different in significant ways. Because of these differences, developers often ask about the specific process to develop and deploy a Windows Azure application - more formally called an Application Lifecycle Management, or ALM.

There are specific resources you can use to learn more about various parts of ALM - I’ve referenced those at the end of this post. But ALM has multiple definitions, from the governance of code injection, domain upgrade, testing, process flow and more. Many developers are interested in the finer-grained information, like how do I develop and deploy an application? What tools do I need, and how do I get the code running somewhere that I can test?

I’ll cover the very high-level process here, and refer you to specifics at the end of each section, so that you can take it all in at one viewing, and then bookmark for more detail when you need more information. I won’t be covering processes like Continuous Integration or Agile and other methodologies in this post - I’ll blog those later.

Initial Development

You start with writing code. You have three ways to do this. You can use Visual Studio (even the Express Edition Works), Eclipse, or by leveraging the REST API format. You can do this in a standalone (non-connected) environment like your laptop.

Using Visual Studio is one of the simplest methods to create an Azure application, allowing you to combine the Azure components you want to leverage (Storage, Compute, SQL Azure, the Service Bus, etc.) along with the on-premises code you have now or are creating. Once you’ve installed and patched Visual Studio, just download and install the Windows Azure Software Development Kit (SDK) and you’ll have not only all the API’s you need to talk to Azure, but a fully functioning local environment to run and test your code before you deploy it. You’ll also get a robust set of samples. You can download what you need for all of that (free) here: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/develop/downloads/ . There’s a step-by-step process here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/ee336122.aspx

You can also use Eclipse to develop for Windows Azure. You won’t get the full runtime environment in just that kit alone, but you can use this successfully on a Linux system. I have several folks using this method. The downloads and documentation for that is here: http://www.windowsazure4e.org/

You can use REST API’s to hit Azure Assets and control them. Not my preferred method, but possible. There are REST API’s for various sections of Azure. You can find the main reference for that here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/ff800682.aspx

Note: We recently demonstrated using a Cloud-based Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for Node.js deployment to Windows Azure. More on that here: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cloud/2012/01/cloud9-ide-to-enable-nodejs-ap.php

Deploying to a Test Instance

After you write the code, you’ll need to test it somewhere. The Azure Emulator on your development laptop is for a single user on that laptop, and it also has some subtle differences from the production fabric as you might imagine. Normally you’ll set up a small subscription to run and test the application, just like you would have a set of test servers. Each subscription has its own management keys and certificates, so this assists in keeping the testing environment separate for billing and control.

More on that general information here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff803362.aspx

Deploying to Production

Once you have developed the code and tested it, you need to move it to a location where users can access it. In reality, there is no physical difference in the type of machines, fabric or any other component in “Production” Windows Azure accounts and the “Test” accounts, but you’ll most often pick smaller systems to deploy on in testing, and you’ll probably keep the URL in the plain format.

In the Production Windows Azure account, the team normally limits the access to the account for deployment to a separate set of developers. This ensures code flow and control. A DNS name is normally mapped to the longer, Microsoft-generated URL so that your users access the application or data the way you want them to.

More on setting up an account here: http://techinch.com/2010/06/14/setup-your-windows-azure-account/

Managing Code Change

With the application deployed, there are two broad tasks you need to consider. One is managing changes through the application, and the other involves management, monitoring and performance tuning for an application.

To make a code change, the standard ALM process is followed, just as above. You can use command-line tools to automate the process as you would with an on-premises system. A vide on that shows you how: http://www.microsoftpdc.com/2009/SVC25. Normally this is used with an “In-Place” upgrade into Production Account, since your testing is completed in a separate account. More on that process here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/ee517255.aspx

One difference is the “VIP Swap” process you can use for the final push to Production. In essence, this allows you to have two copies of the application running on the Production account, with a quick way to cut over and back when you’re ready. The process for that is detailed here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/ee517253.aspx

For monitoring, you have several options. You should enable the Windows Azure Diagnostics in your code - more on that here: http://archive.msdn.microsoft.com/WADiagnostics.

You can observe uptime and other information on the Windows Azure Service Dashboard, where you can also consume the uptime as an RSS feed: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/support/service-dashboard/

From there, you can also use System Center to monitor not only Windows Azure deployments but internal applications as well. The Management Pack and documentation for that is here: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=11324.

There are also 3rd-party tools to manage Windows Azure. More on that here: http://www.bing.com/search?q=monitor+Windows+Azure&form=OSDSRC

Other References:

There is a lot more detail in this official reference: https://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/develop/net/fundamentals/deploying-applications/

Bryan Group explains the ramifications of the Secure Development Lifecycle (SDL) with lots of collateral you can review: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bryang/archive/2011/04/26/applying-the-sdl-to-windows-azure.aspx

Cluster Nodes as RAID Drives

BuckWoody — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:56:00 GMT

I'm unable to sleep tonight so I thought I would push this post out VERY early. When you don't sleep your mind takes interesting turns, which can be a good thing.

I was watching a briefing today by a couple of friends as they were talking about various ways to arrange a Windows Server Cluster for SQL Server. I often see an "active" node of a cluster with a "passive" node backing it up. That means one node is working and accepting transactions, and the other is not doing any work but simply "standing by" waiting for the first to fail over.

The configuration in the demonstration I saw was a bit different. In this example, there were three nodes that were actively working, and a fourth standing by for all three. I've put configurations like this one into place before, but as I was looking at their architecture diagram, it looked familar - it looked like a RAID drive setup! And that's not a bad way to think about your cluster arrangements. The same concerns you might think about for a particular RAID configuration provides a good way to think about protecting your systems in general.

So even if you're not staying awake all night thinking about SQL Server clusters, take this post as an opportunity for "lateral thinking" - a way of combining in your mind the concepts from one piece of knowledge to another. You might find a new way of making your technical environment a little better.

Using linked servers, OPENROWSET and OPENQUERY

BuckWoody — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:41:33 GMT

SQL Server has a few mechanisms to reach out to another server (even another server type) and query data from within a Transact-SQL statement. Among them are a set of stored credentials and information (called a Linked Server), a statement that uses a linked server called called OPENQUERY, another called OPENROWSET, and one called OPENDATASOURCE. This post isn’t about those particular functions or statements – hit the links for more if you’re new to those topics.

I’m actually more concerned about where I see these used than the particular method. In many cases, a Linked server isn’t another Relational Database Management System (RDMBS) like Oracle or DB2 (which is possible with a linked server), but another SQL Server. My concern is that linked servers are the new Data Transformation Services (DTS) from SQL Server 2000 – something that was designed for one purpose but which is being morphed into something much more.

In the case of DTS, most of us turned that feature into a full-fledged job system. What was designed as a simple data import and export system has been pressed into service doing logic, routing and timing. And of course we all know how painful it was to move off of a complex DTS system onto SQL Server Integration Services.

In the case of linked servers, what should be used as a method of running a simple query or two on another server where you have occasional connection or need a quick import of a small data set is morphing into a full federation strategy. In some cases I’ve seen a complex web of linked servers, and when credentials, names or anything else changes there are huge problems.

Now don’t get me wrong – linked servers and other forms of distributing queries is a fantastic set of tools that we have to move data around. I’m just saying that when you start having lots of workarounds and when things get really complicated, you might want to step back a little and ask if there’s a better way. Are you able to tolerate some latency? Perhaps you’re able to use Service Broker. Would you like to be platform-independent on the data source? Perhaps a middle-tier might make more sense, abstracting the queries there and sending them to the proper server. Designed properly, I’ve seen these systems scale further and be more resilient than loading up on linked servers.

Tools and Processes for “Fitting it all in”

BuckWoody — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:42:05 GMT

Most data professionals I’ve met work in two modes: we plan for our day, and we react to the situations around us. I’m staring at my list of things that I need to do today right now, which is my planned work. Of course, I have no idea how much of that will really get done – it’s optimistic to be sure. On the other hand I have several systems I manage, and at any moment one of them or the people that interface with them may “change state” such that I need to give them some attention.

So how do I meld the two? Sometimes it can be quite difficult. I’m constantly working through my list in my mind, re-arranging what I’m focusing on based on what I perceive as the highest need. There are, however, some tools that I use each day to help me manage the workflow.

I use Outlook for tracking everything, since it has a task list (my primary tracking), a calendar, mail and so on. Also I can share the information, it’s on-line so I can see it anywhere, and I can even take it offline onto the plane this week when I fly out of town.

For the “ad-hoc” work, I rely on a script library, which I keep as SQL Server Management Studio projects. I keep those scripts and projects backed using Microsoft Live Mesh, which synchronizes those files (along with a few other critical files and my IE Favorites) across not only my laptop and primary systems, but even with my Virtual Machines.

Also for my SQL Server systems I use the Standard Reports I’ve blogged about here. I also use Greg Larsen’s Database Dashboard, and a series of PowerShell scripts that work across my systems, alerting me to any problems. Of course I’m using SQL Server Agent Jobs quite a bit, and I also use Alerts and some Perfmon automation for my monthly baselining.

So – is this your experience as well? Do you get driven by both planned and unplanned work? What tools and processes do you use to keep it all straight with your SQL Server Instances?

Code that Writes Code

BuckWoody — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:01:40 GMT

I have scripts that re-create my databases for testing and development purposes. But sometimes I want to take the data from a set of tables and move it as well – I could use SSIS, or a SELECT INTO statement, but what if I want to “re-set” the data to a point in time? In other words, load it with some “base data”?

I thought this might be a good place to demonstrate “code that writes code”. No, it isn’t that big of a deal – most DBAs know how to do this, but in the interest of those who don’t, I thought I would share.

So the end result I want in this case is to have a bunch of INSERT statements that contain my base data from a table where that data already exists. I could script out the table from SSMS and use the replacement parameter feature to fill out each record individually:

I have a table in one of my databases that I right-clicked to show the INSERT statement:

-- Person

INSERT

INTO [WAVS].[dbo].[Person]

([PersonName]

,[Street]

,[CityStateZip]

,[PersonType])

VALUES

(<PersonName, varchar(150),>

,<PersonStreet, varchar(100),>

,<PersonCityStateZip, varchar(255),>

,<PersonPersonType, varchar(100),>)

I can use the CTRL-SHIFT-M keys to replace the VALUES part with the values I want.

But I already had a copy of that “base” data before I turned the database over to the testers. Before I give it to them, I run code like this on each table – this one is for the Person table above (note that there should only be two lines here):

SELECT

'INSERT INTO [WAVS].[dbo].[Person] ([PersonID], [PersonName], [Street], [CityStateZip], [PersonType]) VALUES (' + CAST([PersonID] AS VARCHAR(5))+ ', ''' + [PersonName]+ ''', ''' + [Street]+ ''', ''' + [CityStateZip] + ''', ''' + [PersonType] + ''')'

FROM

[WAVS].[dbo].[Person]

When I run this code, I get these statements:

INSERT INTO [WAVS].[dbo].[Person] ([PersonID], [PersonName], [Street], [CityStateZip], [PersonType]) VALUES (1, 'Buck Woody', '123 Here Street', 'Covington, WA 98042', 'Vet')
INSERT INTO [WAVS].[dbo].[Person] ([PersonID], [PersonName], [Street], [CityStateZip], [PersonType]) VALUES (2, 'Jane Doe', '231 Function Ave', 'Redmond, WA 98052', 'Vet')
INSERT INTO [WAVS].[dbo].[Person] ([PersonID], [PersonName], [Street], [CityStateZip], [PersonType]) VALUES (3, 'Diane Wilson', '34251 Appt 3 7th Street', 'Seattle, WA 98061', 'Vet')
INSERT INTO [WAVS].[dbo].[Person] ([PersonID], [PersonName], [Street], [CityStateZip], [PersonType]) VALUES (4, 'John Kelso', '89734 Country Lane', 'Covington, WA 98042', 'Farmer')
INSERT INTO [WAVS].[dbo].[Person] ([PersonID], [PersonName], [Street], [CityStateZip], [PersonType]) VALUES (5, 'Marjorie Christian', '9893452 Changein Lane', 'Maple Valley, WA 98072', 'Farmer')
INSERT INTO [WAVS].[dbo].[Person] ([PersonID], [PersonName], [Street], [CityStateZip], [PersonType]) VALUES (6, 'Joanne Lister', '98904 Mapelwood Drive', 'Spokanne, WA 98045', 'Zoo Worker')

All I have to do is copy those statements into my “initialization” scripts just after the table creations, and then I can run them at will to create my new database (I know I can take a backup – I have reasons for not doing that).

There are two keys for writing code that writes code: The first is to simply use the single tick (') to write out what the end code should say (INSERT INTO, in my case) and then to use multiple ticks (''') when you want the code to contain the ticks themselves. This “escapes” the characters so that you can embed them. If you use SSMS to write your queries, the color coding will look as mine does above. You’ll also need to remember to CAST or CONVERT any data types that don’t concatenate (+) together well. In my case I had to CAST an integer value – but that’s OK, since it is only printing to the screen and I don’t include the ticks, the INSERT works fine.

You can use this method not only with INSERTS, but with lots of operations. And you can also even fire off the code once you create it – but that’s another post :)