<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'Connect', 'service packs', and 'product enhancements'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Connect,service+packs,product+enhancements&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'Connect', 'service packs', and 'product enhancements'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Connect Digest : 2009-05-16 : please vote!</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2009/05/16/connect-digest-2009-05-16-please-vote.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:14103</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><description>Here are the items from this week that I feel deserve some attention. &lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;====================&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hotfixes / service packs should leave authentication mode alone&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I may have talked about this issue here before, I'm not sure, but I
thought I was the only one who saw this happen.&amp;nbsp; This week someone
else came across the issue, where they had a SQL Server 2005 SP2
instance in mixed mode authentication, applied SP3, and the server
changed to Windows Authentication only.&amp;nbsp; This is really not cool and
needs to be fixed!&amp;nbsp; So far I'm the only person who has voted (even the
submitter hasn't voted yet).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#450316 : Named instance changed to Windows-Only authentication on SP3 CU1 hotfix&lt;br&gt;

&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=450316" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=450316" target="_blank"&gt;http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=450316&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;====================&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;Fixing documentation, and really fixing it, in both versions&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They keep closing this item as fixed, but I don't think it is.&amp;nbsp;
(Louis Davidson pointed this out to me earlier this week.)&amp;nbsp; First of
all, they did not fix the 2005 documentation, and I think it should be
corrected in the next revision.&amp;nbsp;And the fix to the 2008 documentation has a typo, which should also be corrected. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#264723 : Doc : dm_os_performance_counters should show cntr_types &lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=264723" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=264723" target="_blank"&gt;http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=264723&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;====================&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;Having samples in the documentation that work&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have pointed out several Books Online topics that have non-functional sample code, and several more that were just bad ideas (like the CREATE DATABASE topic which only used dynamic SQL in the examples).&amp;nbsp; This week someone found a geography sample that yields a .NET Framework error: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#450386 : Non-Functional Example Code: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb933811.aspx&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=450386" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=450386" target="_blank"&gt;http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=450386&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;====================
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Allow us to specify collation for user-defined types&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just this morning (well, I guess this afternoon for him), fellow MVP Erland Sommarskog filed this issue that suggests we should be able to specify collation for user-defined types.&amp;nbsp; Of course, as he states, real domains would be a preferable enhancement. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#451830 : Should be possible to specify collation when define a type/domain&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=451830" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=451830" target="_blank"&gt;http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=451830&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;====================&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>