<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'Connect', 'distributed transactions', and 'connection pooling'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Connect,distributed+transactions,connection+pooling&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'Connect', 'distributed transactions', and 'connection pooling'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Connect digest : 2009-06-20</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2009/06/20/connect-digest-2009-06-20.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:14790</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here are the Connect items I'd like to draw your attention to this week.&amp;nbsp; I have abandoned the idea of trying to keep track of vote counts and overall rating.&amp;nbsp; Being lazy might be a small part of it, but it is mostly because I just don't think it makes sense to assume that my postings are all that influence Connect behavior.&amp;nbsp; I know I have some impact on the visibility of certain items, but I'm going to leave it at that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;==================================== &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;SQL Server 2008 connection pooling problems&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Something to watch out for if you are using connection pooling and SQL Server 2008:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=468478" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=468478" target="_blank"&gt;#468478 : SQL Server 2008 Periodically Does Not Accept Connections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;====================================&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Statistics on partitions&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As partitioning becomes more of a viable and beneficial option, new requirements are creeping out of the woodwork, such as the ability to update statistics per partition instead of for the entire object:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=468517" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=468517" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=468517" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=468517" target="_blank"&gt;#468517 : Update Statistics at the partition level&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;==================================== &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;DBCC SHRINKFILE() flexibility &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While personally I think the need is not all that dire, some people want to be able to shrink a database file to a size smaller than the original allocation (which is currently prevented by SQL Server).&amp;nbsp; Joe Sack made the request formal:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=467285" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=467285" target="_blank"&gt;#467285 : Shrink files beneath originally allocated space&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;==================================== &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Distributed transactions&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Erland has filed a couple of interesting issues regarding distributed transactions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=466739" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=466739" target="_blank"&gt;#466739 : There should be a system function to tell whether the current transaction is a distributed transaction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=466749" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=466749" target="_blank"&gt;#466749 : Cannot call stored procedures when a distributed transaction has been rolled back&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;==================================== &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Clickable URLs in error messages&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, Adam is asking for URLs in the messages pane (e.g. those you could embed in custom messages or ad hoc within RAISERROR) to be clickable.&amp;nbsp; I think it makes a lot of sense, though it is currently resolved as "won't fix"...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=454907" title="http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=454907" target="_blank"&gt;#454907 : Make URLs clickable in the SSMS Messages pane &lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;==================================== &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please remember, I am not trying to coerce you to vote for issues you don't care about, just trying to raise awareness for some items that might have slipped under your radar... &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>