<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'Best Practices', 'Azure', 'Career', and 'Cloud'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Best+Practices,Azure,Career,Cloud&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'Best Practices', 'Azure', 'Career', and 'Cloud'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Book Review (Book 11) - Applied Architecture Patterns on the Microsoft Platform</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2012/05/15/book-review-book-11-applied-architecture-patterns-on-the-microsoft-platform.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:50:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:43364</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a continuation of the books I challenged myself to read to help my career - one a month, for year. &lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2011/06/28/book-review-programming-windows-azure-by-siriram-krishnan.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0066cc;"&gt;You can read my first book review here&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2011/06/07/head-in-the-clouds-eyes-on-the-books.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;the entire list is here&lt;/a&gt;. The book I chose for April 2012 was: &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Applied-Architecture-Patterns-Microsoft-Platform/dp/184968054X" target="_blank"&gt;Applied Architecture Patterns on the Microsoft Platform&lt;/a&gt;. I was traveling at the end of last month so I&amp;rsquo;m a bit late posting this review here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why I chose this book: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I actually know a few of the authors on this book, so when they told me about it I wanted to check it out. The premise of the book is exactly as it states in the title - to learn how to solve a problem using products from Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What I learned:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I liked the book - a lot. They've arranged the content in a "Solution Decision Framework", that presents a few elements to help you identify a need and then propose alternate solutions to solve them, and then the rationale for the choice. But the payoff is that the authors then walk through the solution they implement and what they ran into doing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really liked this approach. It's not a huge book, but one I've referred to again since I've read it. It's fairly comprehensive, and includes server-oriented products, not things like Microsoft Office or other client-side tools. In fact, I would LOVE to have a work like this for Open Source and other vendors as well - would make for a&amp;nbsp;great library for a Systems Architect. This one is unashamedly aimed at the Microsoft products, and even if I didn't work here, I'd be fine with that. As I said, it would be interesting to see some books on other platforms like this, but I haven't run across something that presents other systems in quite this way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And that brings up an interesting point - This book is aimed at folks who create solutions within an organization. It's not aimed at Administrators, DBA's, Developers or the like, although I think all of those audiences could benefit from reading it. The solutions are made up, and not to a huge level of depth - nor should they be. It's a great exercise in thinking these kinds of things through in a structured way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The information is a bit dated, especially for Windows and SQL Azure. While the general concepts hold, the cloud platform from Microsoft is evolving so quickly that any printed book finds it hard to keep up with the improvements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do have one quibble with the text - the chapters are a bit uneven. This is always a danger with multiple authors, but it shows up in a couple of chapters. I winced at one of the chapters that tried to take a more conversational, humorous style. This kind of academic work doesn't lend itself to that style.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recommend you get the book - and use it. I hope they keep it updated - I'll be a frequent customer. :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>“I could use a little help here” or “I can do it myself, thank you” for Cloud Projects</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2012/04/03/i-could-use-a-little-help-here-or-i-can-do-it-myself-thank-you-for-cloud-projects.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:20:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:42665</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Azure allows you to write code in languages within the .NET stack, you can use Java, C++, PHP, NodeJS and others. Code is code - other than keeping things stateless, using a Web or Worker Role in Azure is not all that different from working with an on-premises system. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;However….&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Working in a scalable, component-based stateless architecture that can use federated security is not all that common for many developers. Some are used to owning the server, scaling up, and state-full paradigms that have a single security domain. Making the transition whilst trying to create a new software application or even port a previous one can be daunting. &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/11/16/windows-azure-learning-plan.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Sure, we have absolutely tons of free training, kits, videos, online books and more to learn on your own&lt;/a&gt;, but some things like architecture can be pivotal as you move along. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;So the question is, should you just strike out on your own for a Cloud project, or get &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/microsoftservices/en/us/journey_to_the_cloud.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Microsoft Consulting Services&lt;/a&gt; or another partner to work with you on your first one? I use a few decision points to help guide the projects I assist in.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;font color="#c0504d"&gt;Note: I’m a huge fan of having help that ends up giving you training and leaves you in charge. If you do engage with someone to help you, make sure you keep this clear and take more and more ownership yourself as the project progresses.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How much time do you have?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Usually the first thing I ask is about the timeline for the project. It doesn’t matter how skilled you are, if you have a short window to get things done it’s better to get help - especially if this is your first cloud project. Having someone that knows the platform well can save you amazing amounts of time. If you have longer, then start with the training in the link above and once you feel confident, jump in. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How complex is the project?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I&lt;/strong&gt;f there are a lot of moving parts, it’s best to engage a partner. The reason is that certain interactions - particularly things like Service Bus or Data Integration&amp;#160; - can be quite different than what you may have encountered before. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How many people do you have?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I have a “pizza rule” about projects I’ve used in my career - if it takes over two pizzas to feed everyone on the project, it’s too big and will fail. &lt;img style="border-bottom-style:none;border-left-style:none;border-top-style:none;border-right-style:none;" class="wlEmoticon wlEmoticon-smile" alt="Smile" src="http://blogs.msdn.com/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-blogs-components-weblogfiles/00-00-00-79-79-metablogapi/8780.wlEmoticon_2D00_smile_5F00_2.png" /&gt; That being said, one developer and a one-week deadline does not a good project make, usually. It’s best to have at least one architect (or someone in that role) guiding the project along, and at least two developers to work on a cloud project. That’s a generalization of course, since I’ve seen great software on Azure with one developer writing code all by herself, but for more complex projects, more (to a point) is better. The nice thing about bringing on a partner is that you don’t have to hire them full time - they help you and then they go away. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How critical is the project?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;There’s no shame in using some help. If the platform is new, if the project is large and complex, and if it is critical to the business, you should engage a partner. That’s regardless of Cloud or anything else - get some help. You don’t want to hit your company’s bottom line in a negative way, but you have to innovate and get them a competitive advantage. Do your research, make sure the partner is qualified to help you, and get it done.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Don’t let these questions scare you off. There are lots of projects you can implement on Windows and SQL Azure with nothing other than the Software Development Kit (SDK) that you get for free with Windows Azure. And assistance comes in many forms - sometimes just phone support, a friend you can ask. Microsoft Consulting Services or any of our great partners. You can get help on just the architecture piece or have them show you how to write the code. They’ll get involved as little or as much as you like. &lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>