Search results matching tags 'Application Architecture' and 'Data'

How Does the Cloud Change a Developer's Job?

BuckWoody — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:26:51 GMT

I've recently posted a blog on how cloud computing would change the Systems Architect’s role in an organization, another on how the cloud changes a Database Administrator's job, and the last post dealt with the Systems Administrator. In this post I'll cover the changes facing the Software Developer when using the cloud.

The software developer role was the earliest adopter of cloud computing. This makes perfect sense, because the software developer has always used computing "as a service" - they (most often) don't buy and configure servers, platforms and the like, they write code that runs on those platforms. And there's probably not a simpler definition of a software developer to be found, but as with all simple statements, you lose fidelity and detail. I'll offer a more complete list in a moment.

Because the software developer's process involves designing, testing and writing code locally and then migrating it to a production environment, all of the paradigms in cloud computing - from IaaS to PaaS to SaaS - come naturally.

The Software Developer's Role

The software developer has evolved since the earliest days of programming.The software developer not only "writes code" - there are far more tasks involved in modern systems development:

Assisting the Business Role(s) in developing software specifications
Planning software system components and modules
Designing system components
Working in teams writing classes, modules, interfaces and software endpoints
Designing data layouts, architectures, access and other data controls
Designing and implementing security, either programmatic, declarative, or referential
Mixing and matching various languages, scripting and other constructs within the system
Designing and implementing user and account security rights and restrictions
Designing various software code tests - unit, functional, fuzz, integration, regression, performance and others
Deploying systems
Managing and maintaining code updates and changes

Like most of the previous roles, those tasks also unpacks into a larger set of tasks, and no single developer has exactly that same list. And like the DBA, the role is often more, or less of that list based on where the developer works. Smaller companies may include the development platform in the duties so that a developer is also a systems administrator. In larger organizations I've seen developers that specialized on User Interfaces, Engine Components, Data Controls or other specific areas.

How the Cloud Changes Things

The software developer role obviously has the same concerns and impacts of "the cloud" as the Systems Architect. They need to educate themselves on the options within this new option (Knowledge), try a few test solutions out (Experience) and of course work with others on various parts of the implementation (Coordination).

The big changes for a developer include three major areas: Hybrid Software Design, Security, and Distributed Computing.

Hybrid Software Design

After the PC revolution, software developers designed systems that ran primarily on a single computer. From there the industry moved to "client/server", where most of the code still lived on the user's workstation, and various levels of state (such as the data layer) moved to a server over fast connected lines. After than followed the Internet phase, which had less to do with HTML coding than it did with state-less architectures. While no architecture is truly stateless, there are ways of allowing the client to be in a different state than the server of the application at any one time - this is the way the Web works.

Even so, the developer often simply moved one the primary layers (such as Model, View or Controller) to the server, using the User Interface merely as the View or Presentation layer. While technically stateless, this doesn't require a great deal of architecture change - there are various software modules that run on a server, and perhaps that connects to a remote data server. In the end, it's still a single paradigm.

We now have the ability to run IaaS (hardware abstraction), PaaS (hardware, operating system and runtime abstraction) and SaaS (everything abstracted, API calls only) in a single environment such as Windows Azure. A single application might have a Web-based Interface Server with federated processes (using a PaaS set of roles), a database service (using a SaaS provider such as Windows Azure SQL Database), a specialized process in Linux (using an IaaS role in Windows Azure) and a translator API (from the Windows Azure Marketplace). This example involves only one vendor - Microsoft. I've seen applications that use multiple vendors in this same way.

Thinking this way opens up a great deal of flexibility - and complexity. Complexity isn't evil; it's how complicated things get done many times. The modern developer needs to understand how to build hybrid software architectures.

Resources: Hybrid Architectures with step-by-step instructions and examples: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh871440.aspx and Windows Azure Hybrid Systems: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh871440.aspx?AnnouncementFeed

Security

Having a single security boundary, such as "everyone who works in my company", is a relatively simple problem to solve. Normally the System Administrators configure and control a security provider, such as Active Directory, and developers can access that security layer programmatically. That allows for good separation of duties and role-based control.

In modern applications, clients, managers, and users both internal and external need various levels of access to the same objects, code and data. A client should be able to enter an order, a store should be able to accept the order, the credit-card company should be able to check the order and authorize payment, and the managers should be able to report on the order or change it if needed. Using role-based security across multiple domains would be impossible to maintain.

Enter "claims-based" authentication. In this paradigm, the user logs in with whatever security they use - corporate or other Active Directory, Facebook, Google, whatever. The application (using Windows Identity Foundation or WIF) can accept a "claim" from that provider, and the developer can match whatever parts of that claim they wish to the objects, code and data. And example might be useful.

Buck logs in to his corporate Active Directory (AD), and attempts to use a program based in Windows Azure. Windows Azure rejects the login silently, and is configured to check with Buck's AD. Buck's AD says "yes, I know Buck, and he has been granted the following claims: "partner", "manager", "approver". The developer does not need to know about Buck's AD, Buck, his login, or anything else. She simply codes the proper data access to allow "approver" to approve a sale.

This allows a lot of control, at a very fine level, without having to get into the details of each security provider. .

Resources: Overview of using claims-based Azure Security: http://adnanboz.wordpress.com/2011/02/06/claims-based-access-and-windows-azure/

Distributed Computing

Is there a difference between stateless computing, or even the hybrid programming I mentioned earlier, and "Distributed Computing"? Yes - the primary difference is latency. Even stateless code can have too small a tolerance for latency.

Dealing with slow connectivity, or breaks in connections has many impacts. One method of dealing with this is to locate data and computing of that data as closely as possible, even if this means relaxing consistency or duplicating data. Another method is to go back to a great paradigm from the past that is possible underused today is a Service Oriented Architecture. The Windows Azure Service Bus is possibly one of the fastest and easiest way to adopt cloud computing without completely rearchitecting your application.

References: Great breakdown of the thought process around a distributed architecture: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/jj553517.aspx and using a Windows Azure Relay Service: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/develop/net/how-to-guides/service-bus-relay/

How Does the Cloud Change a Database Administrator’s Job?

BuckWoody — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:08:32 GMT

I recently posted a blog entry on how cloud computing would change the Systems Architect’s role in an organization. In a way, the Systems Architect has the easiest transition to a new way of using computing technologies. In fact, that’s actually part of the job description. I mentioned that a Systems Architect has three primary vectors to think about for cloud computing, as it applies to what they should do:

Knowledge - Which options are available to solve problems, and what are their strengths and weaknesses.
Experience - What has the System Architect seen and worked with in the past.
Coordination - A system design is based on multiple factors, and one person can't make all the choices. There will need to be others involved at every level of the solution, and the Systems Architect will need to know who those people are and how to work with them.

The Database Administrator Role

But a Database Administrator (DBA) is probably one of the harder roles to think about when it comes to cloud computing. First, let’s define what a Database Administrator usually thinks about as part of their job:

Planning, Installing and Configuring a Database Platform
Planning, designing and creating databases
Planning, designing and implementing High Availability and Disaster Recovery for each database (HADR) based on requirements for its workload
Maintaining and monitoring the database platform
Implementing performance tuning on the databases based on monitoring
Re-balancing workloads across database servers based on monitoring
Securing databases platforms and individual databases based on requirements and implementation

That’s just a short list, and each of those unpacks into a larger set of tasks.

The issue is that I’ve never actually met a DBA that does all of those things, or just all of those things. Many times they do much more, sometimes the systems are so large they specialize on just a few of them.

And as you can see from the list, some of these areas are shared with other roles. For instance, in some shops, the DBA plans, purchases, sets up and configures the hardware for database servers. In others that’s done
by the Infrastructure Team. In some shops the DBA designs databases from software requirements, and in others the developers do that – or perhaps it’s done as a joint effort. The same holds true for database code – sometimes the
DBA does it, other times the developer, and still others it’s a shared task.

In fact, you could argue that there are few other roles in IT where the roles are so intermixed. Also, the DBA works with software the company develops, and software the company buys. They work with hardware, networking, security and software. There are certain aspects of design and tuning that are outside the purview of some of those things, and inside the others.

With all of these variables, simply telling a DBA that they should “use the cloud” is not the proper approach.

How the Cloud Changes Things

To be sure, the DBA has the same vectors as the Systems Architect. They need to educate themselves on the options within this new option (Knowledge), try a few test solutions out (Experience) and of course work with others on various parts of the implementation (Coordination). But it goes beyond that.

There are three big buckets of cloud computing, dealing with simply using a Virtual Machine (IaaS) to writing code without worrying about the virtualization or even the operating system (PaaS) and using software that’s already written and being delivered via an Application Programming Interface (API). Each of these has so many options and configurations that it’s often better to think about the problem you’re trying to solve rather than all of the technology within a given area - although some of that is certainly necessary anyway.

Database Platform Architecture

I’ll start with when the DBA should even consider cloud computing for a solution. Once again, it’s not an “all or nothing” paradigm, where you either run something on premises or in the cloud – it’s often a matter of selecting the right components to solve a problem. In my design sessions with DBA’s I break these down into three big areas where they might want to consider the cloud –and then we talk about how to implement each one:

Audiences
HADR
Data Services

Audiences

If the users of your database systems all sit in the same facility, you own the servers and networking, and the application servers are separate from the database server, it doesn’t usually make sense to take that database workload and place it on Windows Azure – or any other cloud provider. The latency alone prevents a satisfactory performance profile, and in some cases won’t work at all. It doesn’t matter if the cloud solution is cheaper or easier – if you’re moving a lot of data every second between an on-premises system and the cloud it won’t work well.

However – if your users are in multiple locations, especially globally, or you have a mix of company and external customer users, it might make sense to evaluate a shared data location. You still need to consider the implications of how much data the application server pushes back and forth, but you may be able to locate both the application server and SQL Server in an IaaS role. Assuming the data sent to the final client will work across public Internet channels, there may be a fit. There are security implications, but unless you have point-to-point connections for your current solution you’re faced with the same security questions on both options.

Your audience might also be developers looking for a way to quickly spin up a server and then turn it down when they are done, paying for the time and not the hardware or licenses. This is also a prime case for evaluating IaaS. And there are others that you'll find in your own organization as you work through the requirements you have.

Resources: Windows Azure Virtual Machines: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/manage/windows/tutorials/virtual-machine-from-gallery/ and Windows Azure SQL Server Virtual Machines: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/manage/windows/common-tasks/install-sql-server/

HADR

The next possible place to consider using cloud computing with SQL Server is as a part of your High Availability and Disaster Recovery plans. In fact, this is the most common use I see for cloud computing and the Database Administrator. The key is the Recovery Point Objective (RPO) and Recovery Time Objective (RTO). Based on each application’s requirements, you may find that using Windows Azure or even supplementing your current plan is
the right place to evaluate options. I’ve covered this use-case in more detail in another article.

References: SQL Server High Availability and Disaster Recovery options with Windows Azure: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2013/01/08/microsoft-windows-azure-disaster-recovery-options-for-on-premises-sql-server.aspx

Data Services

Windows Azure, along with other cloud providers, offers another way to design, create and consume data. In this use-case, however, the tasks DBA’s normally perform for sizing, ordering and configuring a system don’t apply.

With Windows Azure SQL Databases (the artist formerly known as SQL Azure), you can simply create a database and begin using it. There are places where this fits and others where it doesn’t, and there are differences, limitations and enhancements, so it isn’t meant as replacement for what you could do with “Full-up” SQL Server on a Windows Azure Virtual Machine or an on-premises Instance. If a developer needs an Relational Database Management
(RDBMS) data store for a web-based application, then this might be a perfect fit.

But there is more to data services than Windows Azure SQL Databases. Windows Azure also offers MySQL as a service, RIAK and MongoDB (among others) and even Hadoop for larger distributed data sets. In addition you can use Windows Azure Reporting Services, and also tap into datasets and data functions in the Windows Azure Marketplace.

The key for the DBA with this option is that you will have to do a little investigation this time, and potentially without a specific workload in mind this time. I think that’s acceptable thing to ask – DBA’s constantly keep up with data processing trends, and most will consider different ways to solve a problem.

References:

Windows Azure SQL Databases: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/home/features/data-management/

Windows Azure Reporting Services: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/manage/services/other/sql-reporting/

HDInsight Service (Hadoop on Azure): https://www.hadooponazure.com/

MongoDB Offerings on Windows Azure: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/manage/linux/common-tasks/mongodb-on-a-linux-vm/

Windows Azure Marketplace: http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/store/overview/

How Does the Cloud Change a Systems Architect’s Job?

BuckWoody — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:43:59 GMT

I know - I said I didn't like the "cloud" term, but my better-phrased "Distributed Systems" moniker just never took off like I had hoped. So I'll stick with the "c" word for now, at least until the search engines catch up with my more accurate term.

I thought I might spend a little time on how the cloud affects the way we work - from Systems Architects to Database Administrators and Developers, and Systems Administrators - a group often referred to as "IT Pro's". But each role within these groups have different aspects when using cloud computing. In this post we'll take a look at the role of the Systems Architect, and in the posts that follow I'll talk more about the other roles in the IT Pro area.

The Systems Architect Role

What does a "Systems Architect" do? Like most IT roles, it depends on the company or organization where they work. In fact, the term isn't even specific to technology, but I'll use it in that context here. In general, a Systems Architect takes the requirements for a given system, and assembles the relevant technology areas that best fulfill those requirements. That's a single-sentence explanation, and needs further unpacking.

As an example, a Systems Architect at a medical firm is presented with a set of requirements for tracking a patient through the entire care cycle. The Systems Architect first looks at all of the requirements for the data that needs to be collected based on business, financial, regulations, and other requirements, and then how that data needs to flow from one system to another. They check the security requirements, performance, location and other aspects of the system. They then check to see which options are available for processing that data, and which parts they should "build or buy".

For instance, the requirements might be so specific that only custom code is the proper solution - but even there, choices still exist, such as which language(s) to use, what type of data persistence (a Relational Database Management System or or other data storage and processing) will be used, what talent within the company is available for the system and a myriad of other decision.

All of this boils down to three primary vectors:

Knowledge - Which options are available to solve problems, and what are their strengths and weaknesses.
Experience - What has the System Architect seen and worked with in the past.
Coordination - A system design is based on multiple factors, and one person can't make all the choices. There will need to be others involved at every level of the solution, and the Systems Architect will need to know who those people are and how to work with them.

How the Cloud Changes Things

From the outset, it doesn't seem that using a distributed system would change anything in the Systems Architect role. Isn't the cloud simply another option that the Systems Architect needs to learn and apply? Yes, that is true - but it goes a bit deeper. Let's return to those vectors a moment to see what a Systems Architect needs to take into account.

Knowledge

The first and probably most obvious impact is learning about cloud technologies. But the important part of that knowledge is to learn when and where to use each service. It's a common misconception that the cloud should be an "all or nothing" approach. That's just not true - every Windows Azure project I work on has some element of on-premises interaction, and in some cases only one small part of a solution is placed on the Windows Azure architecture. Since Windows Azure contains IaaS (VM's) PaaS (you write code, we run it) and even SaaS (Such as Hadoop or Media Services), a given architecture can use multiple components even within just one provider. And I've worked on several projects where the customer used not only Windows Azure and On-Premises environments, but also components from other providers. That's not only acceptable, but often the best way to solve a given problem.

As part of the learning experience, it's vital to keep in mind what you need to pick as key decision points. In your organization, cost could be ranked higher than performance, or perhaps security is the highest decision point.

To stay educated, there are various journals, websites and conferences that Systems Architects use to keep current. Almost all of those are talking about "cloud" - but there is no substitute for learning from the vendor about their solution. I'm speaking here of the technical information, not the marketing information. The marketing information is also useful, at least from a familiarity standpoint, but the technical information is what you need.

Resource: For Windows Azure, the Systems Architect can start here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2012/06/13/windows-azure-write-run-or-use-software.aspx

Experience

Cloud computing is relatively new - it's only been out a few years, and the main competitors are only now settling in to their respective areas. It might not be common for a Systems Architect to have a lot of hands-on experience with cloud projects.

Even so, there are ways to leverage the experience of others, such as direct contact or even attending conferences where customers present findings from their experiences.

You can also gain hands-on experience by setting up pilots and proof-of-concept projects yourself. Most all vendors - Microsoft included - have free time available on their systems. The key to an experiment like this is choosing some problem you are familiar with that exercises as many features in the platform as possible. There is no substitute for working with a platform when you want to design a solution.

Coordination

Probably one of the largest changes in the Systems Architect role that the cloud brings is in the area of coordination. When a Systems Architect deals with the business and other technical professionals, there is a 20+ year history of technology that we are all familiar with. When you mention "the cloud", those audiences may not have spent the time you have in understanding what that means - and often they think it means the "all or nothing" approach I mentioned earlier.

I've found that a series of "lunch and learns" for the technical staff is useful to explain to each role-group how the cloud is used in their area is useful. In the posts that follow this one, I'll give you some material for those. For managers and business professionals, you'll want to go a different route. I've found that an "Executive Briefing" e-mail, consisting of about a page, with headings that are applicable to your audience.

Resource: Writing Executive Summaries: http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=76

Rip and Replace or Extend and Embrace?

BuckWoody — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:20:05 GMT

As most of you know, I don’t like the term “cloud” very
much. It isn’t defined, which means it can be anything. I prefer “distributed
computing”, which is more technically accurate and describes what you’re doing
in more concrete terms.

So when you think about Windows and SQL Azure, you don’t
have to think about an entire product – you can use parts of the system
together or independently to accomplish what you need to do. You can use the
computing functions, storage, and more and more I see folks leverage the
Service Bus to enable current applications to expose things to the web.

And that brings up the point of this post. Once you decide
that a distributed architecture works to solve a problem, you’re faced with a
decision: should you completely re-write your architecture to take advantage of
the current systems or should you just fold in new code that makes the data or
function available to the web?

Of course, the answer is always “it depends” on the situation
– and it does. But unless you’re fixing a problem with current code, I usually
advocate a migration approach. That means at the very least retaining the
business logic (again, unless it’s not currently working) and as much of the
code as you can. In fact, if you follow this paradigm, you’re on your way to
making a Service Bus out of the functions you currently have. You can expose
the results of a system rather than opening the system up. Let’s take an
example.

Assume for a moment that you have an order-taking system
on-premise. That system performs many functions, one of which might creating a
Purchase Order. Your system might be enclosed, meaning that it has an
application that talks to a middle-tier, and then from there to a database
system. A query is generated from a screen, and passed along to eventually
compute, store and return a Purchase Order Number, along with other
information. Imagine now that you wire up the code not only to return the PO
number to the client, but to make that number available on an endpoint –
actually really not that hard to do.

Now you can make that PO number available to the web using
Azure. You could restrict who can make that call to the system, or open it up
to a broader audience. Or instead of the PO Number, you could make a product
list available. And you can go further than that – EBay, for instance, uses the
OData protocol (which is very cool in and of itself) which you can query from
the web. You could compare your company’s product catalog to what is on EBay,
and list the items you have there if there are no competitors in that space.
And on and on it goes.

So the point is this – where you can, retain what works.
Fold in systems like Azure where they make sense. Extend and Embrace.

Windows Azure Security Review

BuckWoody — Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:24:50 GMT

Current as of 08/01/2011 - Check the Resources listed below for more up-to-date information on this topic

Background:

Security for any computing platform involves three primary areas:

Principals (users or programmatic access to an asset or other program)
Securables (objects, data or programs that can be accessed)
Channels (methods of access by Principals to Securables)

On-premise systems normally use a central system to control security. In a Windows operating system-based environment, this is often accomplished with Active Directory or other systems that provide sign-on and user identity information. While other networking security paradigms have different terminology, all involve the three areas defined above.

In addition to the names and passwords for a user, Active Directory (like other security mechanisms) store other information about Principals - called Claims. These claims can include any custom fields the provider allows. In many networks, these fields are not used heavily, because applications that eventually need to secure the assets they control are not always deployed on the same platforms everywhere.

In a single environment, security is often quite simple. A Principal is created such as a user or group, and then the Principal is granted access to a Securable such as a a folder, database or other asset. Permissions or Rights (or both) combine to allow a particular Principal to read, write, delete or edit data, or to access or run a particular program.

Figure 1 - On-premise security environment example

The simplicity of this arrangement is due to a single, homogenous boundary. Even if more than one location is used, the Principals and Securables are grouped into a single logical boundary that is managed from one location.

This background serves as the starting point for the Federating Security topic below.

Windows Azure Security Boundaries

Windows Azure is a series of resources - servers, data and service buses, in addition to other features. Developers write code, and the deploy that to the Azure environment.

Figure 2 - Azure Components

The code or data can be deployed to use one or more of the services. In other words, the Web Role in Windows Azure might host a simple website, and no other component need be used.

Figure 3 - Simple Azure Web Role Application - only one feature used

Or, a complex mix of Web, Worker and Data Services, along with a Service Bus, RDBS and even on-site systems can be grouped into a much larger program.

Figure 4 - Complex Windows and SQL Azure Application With Multiple Interactions

For a more basic introduction to Windows and SQL Azure, see this link: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/TechEd/Europe/2010/COS322

Windows Azure, like any web-based property, has three general layers of security:

Physical Access
Operating Environment (Including the Operating System itself)
Data and Programmatic Security

Each of these layers have additional layers within themselves, and this forms the basis of a secure experience for the end user or program. Some of these layers are the responsibility of Microsoft; others are the responsibility of the architect and developer; others are a joint or shared responsibility of both Microsoft and the client.

Layer One: Physical Access

The first layer of security within a web property such as Windows or SQL Azure is a secure facility. the following data points are important to understand for the worldwide facilities that host Windows and SQL Azure:

Microsoft Global Foundation Services (GFS) is responsible for the physical security of the datacenters located worldwide for Windows and SQL Azure. Information on Microsoft datacenters can be found here: http://www.globalfoundationservices.com/
The address and exact locations facilities are not commonly documented for security reasons.
Microsoft runs it’s own data centers and does not contract this function out.
The GFS controlled facilities hold an ISO/IEC 27001:2005 certification, and are audited to SAS level II.
Standard secure operations protocols are in place, including least-privilege access.

Layer Two: Operating Environment

Windows Azure and SQL Azure do not currently hold certifications. Microsoft does not comment on the security certifications being pursued for Windows or SQL Azure. That being said, the Windows Azure environment is based on a modified Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise environment, developed using the Trustworthy Computing Initiative (TCI).

The system controlling the host machines and their guest environments that ultimately hold the Web and Worker Roles within Windows Azure is called the Fabric - not to be confused with the Application Fabric feature. The Fabric is not accessible by client code - it controls the inner workings of Windows Azure, including Load-balancing, system restarts, maintenance and monitoring.

Within the host machines that house the Web and Worker Roles, special networking constructs broker all conversations between Virtual Machines. Virtual Machines - even ones configured to communicate with each other - move through this network. Direct-machine to machine communication is not allowed, protecting one application from another or one data construct from another.

Figure 5 - Windows Azure Fabric

Windows and SQL Azure support only TCP-based communications. Ports commonly used are:

80 - Default public port used for Web Roles - can be enabled/disabled per configuration
443 - Default secure port used for Web roles - can be enabled/disabled per configuration
9350-9353 - These ports are used by the Windows Azure AppFabric service bus bindings. Refer to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee732535.aspx for more details
1433 - SQL Azure
3389 - This port is used for RDP access to VM-based roles, only if enabled

Layer Three: Data and Programmatic Security

All internal access through use of keys only. Without the proper key, code or data will not transfer. Storage Accounts have individual keys, so in this manner different security layers may be applied not only programmatically but at the account layer.

Figure 6 - Windows Azure communications between components

Calls to Windows Azure are made using standard SOAP, XML or REST-based protocols. The communications channel can be encrypted between the client and Windows Azure or allow it to remain unencrypted based on security needs.

SQL Azure uses the standard SQL Server Tabular Data Stream (TDS) protocol, but only allows encrypted communications.

Data is unencrypted within Windows Azure Blob or Table Storage - but is only accessible via the key for a storage account. Data can be encrypted client-side and stored in Windows Azure in an encrypted fashion. Microsoft does not inspect internal data for validity or encryption enforcement. The key is that the data is client-side encrypted and decrypted.

Figure 7 - Example data at rest encryption scenario

Alternatively, a hybrid solution can store sensitive data locally and non-sensitive data in Azure Storage. The data can be coalesced at the client level such that the data is never transferred over any channel not owned or controlled by the organization.

Federating Security:

In the case of a single security boundary for Windows Azure, multiple security options are available. Users can be anonymously authorized, such as in the case of a public website for advertisement or informational purposes.

Another option is to create an Internet Information Services (IIS) Internal Security Store. This is not a best-practice (although still possible) approach since the Fabric services within Windows Azure may recycle an instance and the session may sever between a given role and a client. Architecting stateless applications is a preferred approach.

Using Claims-Based Authentication is a better solution. In this approach, the Principal is authenticated through a trusted party, such as Active Directory, OpenID, OpenAuthentication, or LiveID. Many web-properties use these methods, such as Microsoft, Google, Yahoo and Facebook to name a few. After authenticating with one of these services, the client is issued Claims using the WS-Federation (WS-Fed) or Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) that are passed to Windows Azure. At no time does Windows Azure store, transfer or interrogate the Principal’s security token. Claims can be anything from a group or role membership to location or any other settable attribute. Assets are then secured allowing only the Claim, without regard to the user’s location or access method. In this fashion a single security paradigm covers the Securables, with the Principals being controlled in any number of other mechanisms. This allows single-sign-on and/or federated security access from multiple providers.

The simplest mechanism for building this environment is the Access Control Services (ACS) feature found in the Windows Azure Application Fabric component. It is a federated authorization management service that simplifies user access authorization across organizations and ID providers and performs claims transformation to map identities with access levels.

ACS can:

Create and manage scopes such as URLs
Create and manage claim types
Create and manage signing and encryption keys
Create and manage rules within an application scope
Chain claims rules
Manage permissions on scopes or perform delegation

Figure 8 - Federated Security Example

Full information on the Access Control Service is available at this link: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/windows-identity-foundation-wif-and-azure-appfabric-access-control-service-acs-survival-guide.aspx?wa=wsignin1.0

Since the Web and Worker Roles within Windows Azure are designed to be stateless, Microsoft created a Certification Store within the Management area to hold Certificates that can be called from within code. An example of using the Certification Store is here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jnak/archive/2010/01/29/installing-certificates-in-windows-azure-vms.aspx

Additional Resources:

Official, authoritative security resource list: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff934690.aspx
Technical Overview of the Security Features in the Windows Azure Platform: http://www.microsoft.com/online/legal/?langid=en-us&docid=11.
Windows Azure Security Overview: http://www.globalfoundationservices.com/security/documents/WindowsAzureSecurityOverview1_0Aug2010.pdf
Windows Azure Privacy: http://www.microsoft.com/online/legal/?langid=en-us&docid=11
Securing Microsoft Cloud Infrastructure: http://www.globalfoundationservices.com/security/documents/SecuringtheMSCloudMay09.pdf.
A list of other security resources is here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/07/windows-azure-learning-plan-security.aspx

Image Attribution: David Pallmann: http://davidpallmann.blogspot.com/2011/07/windows-azure-design-patterns-part-1.html