<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'Administration', 'SQL Server', and 'Microsoft'</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Administration,SQL+Server,Microsoft&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'Administration', 'SQL Server', and 'Microsoft'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>How Does Microsoft Do IT?</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2010/02/03/how-does-microsoft-do-it.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:17:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:21774</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft is a big company – and of course we have a lot of IT infrastructure that we have to manage. It might surprise you to learn that we have an IT group, just like at your company. We have a networking team, a server hardware team, software teams, DBA’s, the whole bit. In fact, we have more Mac computers than just about anyone (other than that company down south from here) and we write some of the best-selling Apple software. We have a Linux lab. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;How do we do that? How do you manage 80,000+ seats, especially when most of your company are a bunch of tech-savvy geeks? It’s a tough job, but the neat thing is that we tell you how we’re doing it – everything – right here: &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb687780.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb687780.aspx&lt;/a&gt;. If you want to focus in on just SQL Server, just check here: &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb687798.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb687798.aspx&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(By the way - I *totally* should be doing our marketing – isn’t that title catchy? My catch-phrases and product names would be a lot better than what we normally come up with. I’m just sayin’.)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Know Your Product Specifications</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2010/01/13/know-your-product-specifications.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:57:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:21010</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As the Data Professional in your organization, the rest of the org looks to you to ensure that the system can handle what the business requires. To do that, you need to know two things: what the business requires, and what SQL Server can do.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;But of course there’s a bit more to it than that. Knowing the business side of the requirements – well, I teach an entire course on that. But knowing what SQL Server can do is something you can find out on your own.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;SQL Server comes in &lt;em&gt;versions&lt;/em&gt;, which are released based on date, and &lt;em&gt;editions&lt;/em&gt;, which are based on features and capabilities. It’s that last part that I want to focus on today.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;As Microsoft SQL Server matures, you’re going to see even more separation between what each edition of SQL Server can do and where it should be used. In the past, most folks have only focused on three editions – Express (the “free” one), Standard, and Enterprise. The rule of thumb was that if Standard was good enough at the moment, put it in. And it is true (and a good thing) that you can upgrade from one edition to another fairly easily.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;But as time goes on, we should spend a little more time understanding what each edition does, what it’s features and capabilities are, and where and when we should put them in. As I study this information, I’ll throw in my 2 cents and you can as well based on what you see. One thing I’ve found so far is that once I have the business requirements, there’s a mix of what I can write in code and what might already be included in a different edition. It’s important to look long and hard at that choice – writing a feature on my own is certainly cheaper in the short term than moving to a “higher” edition, but in some cases it makes sense to let Microsoft handle that lifting.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;These links are ones that you should bookmark and take a peek at periodically. They are the “header” links for more information on those features and capabilities:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;SQL Server 2008: &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143287.aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143287.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;SQL Server 2008 R2: &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143287(SQL.105).aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143287(SQL.105).aspx&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In addition, you might start learning a little more about SQL Azure. I’ll talk more about that later.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>