<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Tibor Karaszi</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Send email after Agent job execution</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/12/28/send-email-after-agent-job-execution.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40667</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/40667.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=40667</wfw:commentRss><description>After executing a job, I want to have an email with the following information: Success or failure in the mail subject (not just in the body) Success or failure and execution time for each job step in mail body Have output file(s) for the job steps attached...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/12/28/send-email-after-agent-job-execution.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40667" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/SQL+Server+Agent/default.aspx">SQL Server Agent</category></item><item><title>SQL Live Monitor</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/11/19/sql-live-monitor.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:39884</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/39884.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=39884</wfw:commentRss><description>I just found this one out there and wanted to share it. It connects to an instance and show you a bunch of figures. Nothing you can't extract yourself with SQL queries, but sometimes it is just nice to have one tool which is very easy to use. Here's what...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/11/19/sql-live-monitor.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=39884" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category></item><item><title>Who owns your jobs?</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/10/06/who-owns-your-jobs.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:38900</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/38900.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=38900</wfw:commentRss><description>Yep, another Agent blog. The topic of job owner has been discussed here before, but this is a specific situation, which potentially is a ticking bomb. First a quick recap of how agent does things: When a job is owned by somebody who is sysadmin, then...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/10/06/who-owns-your-jobs.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=38900" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Troubleshooting/default.aspx">Troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/SQL+Server+Agent/default.aspx">SQL Server Agent</category></item><item><title>Agent Alerts Management Pack updated</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/09/15/agent-alerts-management-pack-updated.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:38484</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/38484.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=38484</wfw:commentRss><description>I have updated the Agent Alerts Management Pack, cleaned up the T-SQL code which creates the alerts. You can now just copy, paste and execute that code. Earlier, for some of the some of the alert definitions it just generated the calls to the query result...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/09/15/agent-alerts-management-pack-updated.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=38484" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/SQL+Server+Agent/default.aspx">SQL Server Agent</category></item><item><title>Ola Hallengren's maint procedures now supports logging to table</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/07/16/ola-hallengren-s-maint-procedures-now-supports-logging-to-table.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 01:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:36985</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/36985.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=36985</wfw:commentRss><description>This can for instance be very useful if you want to keep track how long time things take, over time. Check them out here .Version history here ....(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/07/16/ola-hallengren-s-maint-procedures-now-supports-logging-to-table.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=36985" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Maintenance/default.aspx">Maintenance</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/SQL+Server+Agent/default.aspx">SQL Server Agent</category></item><item><title>Article released about moving databases</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/07/10/article-released-about-moving-databases.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:36757</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/36757.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=36757</wfw:commentRss><description>Just a short notice that I've released an article about moving databases between SQL Server instances: You find it at http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_moving_database.asp ....(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/07/10/article-released-about-moving-databases.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=36757" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Maintenance/default.aspx">Maintenance</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Troubleshooting/default.aspx">Troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/SQL+Server+Agent/default.aspx">SQL Server Agent</category></item><item><title>Restricting memory using Resource Governor</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/04/19/restricting-memory-using-resource-governor.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:35008</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/35008.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=35008</wfw:commentRss><description>You might know that Resource Governor (RG) can be used to allow you to affect resource allocation inside SQL Server. RG was introduced with SQL Server 2008 and requires Enterprise Edition or similar/higher. There are two things you can govern using RG:...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/04/19/restricting-memory-using-resource-governor.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=35008" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category></item><item><title>What does this Express Edition look like, anyhow?</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/02/10/what-does-this-express-edition-look-like-anyhow.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:33378</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/33378.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=33378</wfw:commentRss><description>Chances are that you rarely get to see the Express Edition of SQL Server if you mainly work with servers. This blog post is inspired from a forum discussion where some functionality is missing in SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) and I suspected that...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/02/10/what-does-this-express-edition-look-like-anyhow.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=33378" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Installation/default.aspx">Installation</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Express+Edition/default.aspx">Express Edition</category></item><item><title>Are we Borg?</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/02/09/are-we-borg.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:33353</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/33353.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=33353</wfw:commentRss><description>Is it time to stop remeber things? For real, this time? Today I needed to find two pieces of SQL Server related information. One was straight foward, I posted it on #sqlhelp on twitter and a minute or so later I had the answer. The other was a bit more...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/02/09/are-we-borg.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=33353" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upgrading from Express Edition to Standard Edition</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/01/27/upgrading-from-express-edition-to-standard-edition.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:32952</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/32952.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=32952</wfw:commentRss><description>Say you encounter an SQL Server which is Express Edition, and it really should have been some higher edition. Sounds familiar? It is common for me as a consultant to find plenty of SQL Servers at a customer's site. Many of the databases in these will...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2011/01/27/upgrading-from-express-edition-to-standard-edition.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32952" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Installation/default.aspx">Installation</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/SQL+Server+Agent/default.aspx">SQL Server Agent</category></item><item><title>Point-in-time restore of database backup?</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/12/28/point-in-time-restore-of-database-backup.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:32051</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/32051.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=32051</wfw:commentRss><description>SQL Server 2005 added the STOPAT option for the RESTORE DATABASE command. This sounds great - we can stop at some point in time during the database backup process was running! Or? No, we can't. Here follows some tech stuff why not, and then what the option...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/12/28/point-in-time-restore-of-database-backup.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32051" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Backup/default.aspx">Backup</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Transaction+log/default.aspx">Transaction log</category></item><item><title>Another bugfix for sp_indexinfo</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/11/09/another-bugfix-for-sp-indexinfo.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:30289</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/30289.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=30289</wfw:commentRss><description>JackMcC reported correctly at http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2009/02/18/sp-indexinfo-updated.aspx that sp_indexinfo will count rows double (or even tripple) if there are lob or row overflow allocations. Now fixed. Thanks Jack....(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/11/09/another-bugfix-for-sp-indexinfo.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30289" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category></item><item><title>Why we never want to trick SQL Server into rebuilding a log file</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/10/14/why-we-never-want-to-trick-sql-server-into-rebuilding-a-log-file.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:29398</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/29398.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29398</wfw:commentRss><description>"Never" is a strong word, so let me say that we really really want to avoid it, if at all humanly possible. In short, we will have a (potentially) broken database, both at the physical level and at the logical level. Read on. Just to be clear, when I...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/10/14/why-we-never-want-to-trick-sql-server-into-rebuilding-a-log-file.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29398" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Backup/default.aspx">Backup</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Maintenance/default.aspx">Maintenance</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Troubleshooting/default.aspx">Troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Transaction+log/default.aspx">Transaction log</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Availability/default.aspx">Availability</category></item><item><title>New util proc: sp_tableinfo</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/10/10/new-util-proc-sp-tableinfo.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:29279</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/29279.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29279</wfw:commentRss><description>Some of you might use my sp_indexinfo to easily get lots of details about the indexes in a database. I added an sp_tableinfo with info rolled up to table level. This allow to quickly see the largest tables in a database and things like that. Check it...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/10/10/new-util-proc-sp-tableinfo.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29279" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category></item><item><title>Why can't we have column alias in ORDER BY?</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/10/03/why-can-t-we-have-column-alias-in-order-by.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 09:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:29117</guid><dc:creator>TiborKaraszi</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/comments/29117.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29117</wfw:commentRss><description>You probably think something like "What! Of course we can!". And so did I when I read the title for a post about this in a forum. Let us first establish that you can have a column alias in ORDER BY: SELECT p.ProductID AS pid , p.ListPrice AS pr FROM Production.Product...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/2010/10/03/why-can-t-we-have-column-alias-in-order-by.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29117" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi/archive/tags/TSQL/default.aspx">TSQL</category></item></channel></rss>
