<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rick Heiges : High Availability, SQL Community, SQL 2008</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/tags/High+Availability/SQL+Community/SQL+2008/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: High Availability, SQL Community, SQL 2008</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>No More HCL - in 2008</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/2007/12/19/no-more-hcl-in-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:4101</guid><dc:creator>RickHeiges</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/comments/4101.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4101</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;The old Hardware Compatibility List which was renamed the "Windows Catalog" is no more.&amp;nbsp; When creating a Clustered&amp;nbsp;Solution, you need to have a system that is Certified for clustering or there will be no official support.&amp;nbsp; This has been a point of pain in the past as organizations purchased a clustered solution and then one of the nodes has issues after a year or two.&amp;nbsp; Getting an exact replica of that node is often impossible and impractical.&amp;nbsp; Try explaining to the big wigs that you need to purchase a new system that is 2 years old - not very compelling.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In Windows 2008 and SQL 2008, there is no need for a certified solution.&amp;nbsp; There is a program called clusprep.exe that you run on the nodes of the proposed cluster to test/prepare the nodes.&amp;nbsp; If your system passes, it can run on a cluster.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One drawback of this is that when failing over to a node of lesser "girth", the user experience may suffer.&amp;nbsp; Also, with this change, the base of clustering is changing which means that your upgrade to the 2008 flavor will take some more planning.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you attended the PASS Community Summit in Denver, you can view the streaming session online on Clustering.&amp;nbsp; It was very educational.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4101" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/tags/High+Availability/default.aspx">High Availability</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/tags/Katmai/default.aspx">Katmai</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/tags/New+Features/default.aspx">New Features</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/tags/SQL+2008/default.aspx">SQL 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/tags/SQL+Community/default.aspx">SQL Community</category></item></channel></rss>