<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx</link><description>The following table summarizes the results from my last two blog entries, showing the CPU time used when performing 5 million clustered index seeks: In test 1, making the clustered index unique improved performance by around 40%. In test 2, making the</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#37625</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:37625</guid><dc:creator>Rob Farley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice, Paul.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#37626</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:20:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:37626</guid><dc:creator>Paul White</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Cheers, Rob.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#37627</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:23:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:37627</guid><dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Fascinating read as always!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#37629</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:37629</guid><dc:creator>Alexander Kuznetsov</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a brilliant post, of course, but I am not completely with you on the following: &amp;quot;Linear interpolation has the potential to be more efficient even than binary search&amp;quot; - there are some exceptions when a slow but reliable binary search converges much faster than its smarter alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#37630</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:17:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:37630</guid><dc:creator>csm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great. It's always a pleasure read articles like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#37637</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:27:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:37637</guid><dc:creator>tobi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Who would have guessed this explanation?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#37641</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:50:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:37641</guid><dc:creator>Paul White</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Alex: Agreed, and that's why I said &amp;quot;has the potential&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;There is much more detail in the papers referenced at the end of the post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@csm: Thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@tobi: I didn't hear from anyone that guessed correctly. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps I should have offered a prize ;c)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#45101</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 06:59:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:45101</guid><dc:creator>amit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;its 2 gud dude................&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server, Seeks, and Binary Search</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/paul_white/archive/2011/08/09/sql-server-seeks-and-binary-search.aspx#48749</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:24:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:48749</guid><dc:creator>Boris Hristov</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Insanely great article, Paul! &lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>