<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Methodology comparison: Kimball, Inmon and SQLBI</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/marco_russo/archive/2008/09/20/methodology-comparison-kimball-inmon-and-sqlbi.aspx</link><description>This post is part of a Methodology discussion - other posts will follows. I will be happy to get your feedback! I am proud to announce a public draft of the first paper about the SQLBI Methodology . I and Alberto Ferrari tried to define a consistent methodology</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: Methodology comparison: Kimball, Inmon and SQLBI</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/marco_russo/archive/2008/09/20/methodology-comparison-kimball-inmon-and-sqlbi.aspx#9007</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:29:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:9007</guid><dc:creator>James Luetkehoelter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Marco,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really like these discussions of methodologies, and the approach that the multi-dimensional tool does have an affect on the methodology chosen. Keep this stuff coming!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Methodology comparison: Kimball, Inmon and SQLBI</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/marco_russo/archive/2008/09/20/methodology-comparison-kimball-inmon-and-sqlbi.aspx#9012</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:30:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:9012</guid><dc:creator>Marco Russo (SQLBI)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;James, download the paper and join us in the SQLBI Methodology forum sharing your comments!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>