<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Evaluating server hardware: a sign of the times</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2012/01/03/evaluating-server-hardware-a-sign-of-the-times.aspx</link><description>For nearly ten years, I have had success in using a specifically modified version of the TPC-C benchmark for evaluating server hardware running SQL Server. Depending on your purpose, you can evaluate computer hardware in numerous ways with numerous benchmarks.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: Evaluating server hardware: a sign of the times</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2012/01/03/evaluating-server-hardware-a-sign-of-the-times.aspx#40761</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:31:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40761</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Kejser</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Linchi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interesting benchmark and data here. I would really like to see the dump of waits/spins/latches (no filters of &amp;quot;ignore waits&amp;quot; please) for 1 minute of this run. Could you mail my address with it please?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, curious to know if you see large kernel times on this system?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers and happy new year&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thomas&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Evaluating server hardware: a sign of the times</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2012/01/03/evaluating-server-hardware-a-sign-of-the-times.aspx#40770</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:33:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40770</guid><dc:creator>GrumpyOldDBA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the key factors in comparing servers is the memory speed , for in memory iops this will be the limiting factor - on the basis there's always one part of the system which is a bottle neck.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did you factor this in at all - just interested.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Evaluating server hardware: a sign of the times</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2012/01/03/evaluating-server-hardware-a-sign-of-the-times.aspx#40778</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:51:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40778</guid><dc:creator>Linchi Shea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thomas;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'll email you the stats when I get a chance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GrumpyOldDBA;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Memoy speed is definitely a key factor, actually a major factor in determining the server performance, and the benchmark is shown to be sensitive to that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Evaluating server hardware: a sign of the times</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2012/01/03/evaluating-server-hardware-a-sign-of-the-times.aspx#40787</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:06:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40787</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Bowers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting, thanks for posting this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What were the &amp;quot;transactions per second&amp;quot; seen in your four E7-4870 scenarios? &amp;nbsp;I'm curious to know whether that correlated with the &amp;quot;% Total CPU Usage&amp;quot; you measured.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you typically modify power management settings (in either BIOS or Windows) when running your tool?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Evaluating server hardware: a sign of the times</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2012/01/03/evaluating-server-hardware-a-sign-of-the-times.aspx#40788</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:37:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40788</guid><dc:creator>Linchi Shea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Daniel! I knew someone would ask the question about the throughput. I hope to have that coveredina next post as I can't really do justice in a comment. But suffice it to say that E7-4870 is impressive in the tests I have run.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The server is set for performance not power savings. I don't change the setting in any of the tests.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Performance impact: hyperthreading for OLTP queries</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2012/01/03/evaluating-server-hardware-a-sign-of-the-times.aspx#40855</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 04:44:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40855</guid><dc:creator>Linchi Shea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My previous post focuses on the performance impact of enabling hyperthreading (HT) on a machine with&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Performance impact: hyperthreading on Intel Westmere-EP processors (X5690)</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2012/01/03/evaluating-server-hardware-a-sign-of-the-times.aspx#41217</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:41:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:41217</guid><dc:creator>Linchi Shea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently, I have been looking into the performance impact of enabling hyperthreading on various platforms&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>