<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Performance impact: file fragmentation and SAN – Part II</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2008/12/08/performance-impact-file-fragmentation-and-san-part-ii.aspx</link><description>1KB Sequential Writes on DAS There were some questions about the use 1KB sequential writes in my previous post to test the performance impact of file fragmentation on a drive presented from a high end enterprise class disk array. There were two reasons</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: Performance impact: file fragmentation and SAN – Part II</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2008/12/08/performance-impact-file-fragmentation-and-san-part-ii.aspx#10380</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:29:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:10380</guid><dc:creator>Brent Ozar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm excited to see you blogging again, sir! &amp;nbsp;I missed your disk metrics. &amp;nbsp;Keep up the good work - this is one of the things that takes DBAs forever to do, and it's hard to work it into a DBA schedule. &amp;nbsp;Good stuff.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Performance impact: file fragmentation and SAN – Part II</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2008/12/08/performance-impact-file-fragmentation-and-san-part-ii.aspx#10393</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:12:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:10393</guid><dc:creator>James Luetkehoelter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ooo, nice Linchi. I run into many a SAN administrator who is adamant that fragmentation just &amp;quot;doesn't happeon on a SAN, and if would the impact would be negligible&amp;quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great to have quantitative validation!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Performance Impact: file fragmentation and SAN – Part III</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2008/12/08/performance-impact-file-fragmentation-and-san-part-ii.aspx#10439</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:19:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:10439</guid><dc:creator>Linchi Shea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;256KB Sequential Reads In my two previous posts ( 1 , 2 ), I highlighted the fact that while file fragmentation&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Performance impact: file fragmentation and SAN – Part IV</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2008/12/08/performance-impact-file-fragmentation-and-san-part-ii.aspx#10690</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:40:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:10690</guid><dc:creator>Linchi Shea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Lies, damned lies, and statistics! If you have read my three previous posts ( 1 , 2 , 3 ), you may walk&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>