<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Implementing A Hash Partition In SQL Server 2005</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kevin_kline/archive/2008/04/21/implementing-a-hash-partition-in-sql-server-2005.aspx</link><description>One of the best things about becoming a Microsoft MVP is meeting other MVPs. I bring this up because last week was the annual MVP Summit in Seattle, WA. I was really looking forward to meeting Steve Kass . Steve Kass is one of the smartest SQL Server</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: Implementing A Hash Partition In SQL Server 2005</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kevin_kline/archive/2008/04/21/implementing-a-hash-partition-in-sql-server-2005.aspx#6329</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:22:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:6329</guid><dc:creator>Adam Machanic</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The only problem with doing something like this is that every one of your queries against the partitioned table is going to have to know the algorithm in order to produce a predicate that can be matched for partition elimination. &amp;nbsp;If the engine would do this hashing work for us it could encapsulate all of that logic... I'm not sure why this capability was removed from the list for both 2005 and 2008 -- at least on the surface, it certainly doesn't seem difficult to implement!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Implementing A Hash Partition In SQL Server 2005</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kevin_kline/archive/2008/04/21/implementing-a-hash-partition-in-sql-server-2005.aspx#6380</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:59:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:6380</guid><dc:creator>KKline</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, I didn't think of that!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And you're right, it should be easy to do. &amp;nbsp;Both Oracle and DB2 have hash partitions in the box.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Implementing A Hash Partition In SQL Server 2005</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kevin_kline/archive/2008/04/21/implementing-a-hash-partition-in-sql-server-2005.aspx#34936</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 03:49:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:34936</guid><dc:creator>ZZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If a table has one &amp;amp; only one Column.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In which normal form we can categorize that table ?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tuning indexes | Ideas, Knowledge y Tecnolog??a</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kevin_kline/archive/2008/04/21/implementing-a-hash-partition-in-sql-server-2005.aspx#48953</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 06:28:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:48953</guid><dc:creator>Tuning indexes | Ideas, Knowledge y Tecnolog??a</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://metodoikt.wordpress.com/2013/05/01/tuning-indexes/"&gt;http://metodoikt.wordpress.com/2013/05/01/tuning-indexes/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>