<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Geek City: Join With Me!</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kalen_delaney/archive/2013/02/14/index-intersection.aspx</link><description>I remember one of the most surprising changes in SQL Server 2000 2005 was how the graphical plans showed the use of a nonclustered index to seek, and the plan included something that looked like a JOIN to find rows in the base table. Here’s an example.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: Geek City: Join With Me!</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kalen_delaney/archive/2013/02/14/index-intersection.aspx#47728</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:18:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:47728</guid><dc:creator>Rob Farley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kalen,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nice post. Reminded me a little of one of mine from December.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rob_farley/archive/2012/12/11/joins-in-single-table-queries.aspx"&gt;http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rob_farley/archive/2012/12/11/joins-in-single-table-queries.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great to know that we get our interest piqued by similar things. :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rob&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Geek City: Join With Me!</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kalen_delaney/archive/2013/02/14/index-intersection.aspx#47733</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:47733</guid><dc:creator>Adam Machanic</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kalen,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just to set the record straight, the graphical plan change came in 2005. In 2000 it still looked like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-postattachments/00-00-65-26-24/bookmark_5F00_lookup_5F00_2000.PNG"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-postattachments/00-00-65-26-24/bookmark_5F00_lookup_5F00_2000.PNG&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Image from Craig Freedman's blog post in which he described the 2005 change -- which is one of the best plan changes ever made, in my humble opinion: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/craigfr/archive/2006/06/30/652639.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/b/craigfr/archive/2006/06/30/652639.aspx&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Geek City: Join With Me!</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kalen_delaney/archive/2013/02/14/index-intersection.aspx#47739</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:09:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:47739</guid><dc:creator>Kalen Delaney</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Aack! I thought about this long and hard, but I admit, I didn't try looking it up. I thought the change happened before XML plans were introduced, which was in 2005. And I think it's an awesome change too... when I said in the post that I have come to appreciate it, I meant that I REALLY love it! &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks Adam.... &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>