<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Joe Chang : disks</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/tags/disks/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: disks</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Data, Log and Temp file placement</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/2010/03/23/data-log-and-temp-file-placement.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:23670</guid><dc:creator>jchang</dc:creator><slash:comments>19</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/comments/23670.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/commentrss.aspx?PostID=23670</wfw:commentRss><description>First, especially for all the people with SAN storage, drive letters are of no consequence. What matters is the actual physical disk layout behind each RAID Group or LUN. Forget capacity, pay attention to the number of spindles supporting each RAID group....(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/2010/03/23/data-log-and-temp-file-placement.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=23670" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/tags/disks/default.aspx">disks</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/tags/log+files/default.aspx">log files</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/tags/Storage/default.aspx">Storage</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/tags/tempdb/default.aspx">tempdb</category></item></channel></rss>