<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Oracle Index Skip Scan</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/2011/06/13/oracle-index-skip-scan.aspx</link><description>There is a feature, called index skip scan that has been in Oracle since version 9i. When I across this, it seemed like a very clever trick, but not a critical capability. More recently, I have been advocating DW on SSD in approrpiate situations, and</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: Oracle Index Skip Scan</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/2011/06/13/oracle-index-skip-scan.aspx#39060</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:32:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:39060</guid><dc:creator>robnoi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding the discussion about the &amp;quot;skip scan&amp;quot;, there is now a Microsoft Connect item: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/695044/implement-index-skip-scan"&gt;https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/695044/implement-index-skip-scan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please vote for it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Oracle Index Skip Scan</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/2011/06/13/oracle-index-skip-scan.aspx#39184</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:39:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:39184</guid><dc:creator>jchang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well the connect request could have included a link to my blog. I am sure Conor loves my suggestions and will promptly put all my requests to the top of his (recycle) bin&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Oracle Index Skip Scan</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/2011/06/13/oracle-index-skip-scan.aspx#43801</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:46:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:43801</guid><dc:creator>tobi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I just added a link to this post from the connect item (I opened the connect item originally). Please vote on it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Oracle Index Skip Scan</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/joe_chang/archive/2011/06/13/oracle-index-skip-scan.aspx#48375</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:16:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:48375</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Adeniji</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. &amp;nbsp;Your insight into Storage Performance is groundbreaking &amp;amp; breathtaking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like your frustration about certain things. &amp;nbsp;And, how you take the minimal, engineering approach to problem isolation and solving.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And, turn around and ask each of us, have you thought about this problem, as well. &amp;nbsp;And, how did you solve it -- By adding another index?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>