Ramblings of Greg Low (SQL Server MVP, MCM and Microsoft RD) - SQL Down Under
I was teaching a SQL 2014 class yesterday and the students were using the current SQL Server 2014 Enterprise (on Windows Server 2012 R2) template.
We were using the Table Memory Optimization Advisor (right-click a table in Object Explorer within SQL Server Management Studio). I had several people in the class that reported that when they got to the primary key migration screen, that they couldn’t interact with the screen because the checkboxes were not present in the displayed list of columns.
This is what the screen should have looked like:
This is what it did look like:
Note that there are no checkboxes in the left-hand column. I had never seen that happen before.
We tried clicking, etc. in the area (wondering if there was some odd font problem or something) to no avail. There seemed to be plenty of room for a checkbox so it seemed like there must be some logical reason why it didn’t want any of these columns as the primary key. But it only happened on some machines.
Eventually, one of the students resized the rows that were displayed. The checkboxes then appeared.
This is a basic UI issue. I’ve recorded it here in case anyone else runs into it.
Nice to see some updated connectors for Oracle and Teradata for SQL Server Integration Services developers/users.
Version 3.0 of the Attunity connectors have been released. Some of these have substantial improvements. For example, the list of enhanced features for the Teradata connector includes:
- Expose additional TPT Stream Attributes(TD_PACK and TD_PACKMAXIMUM) to provide maximum tuning flexibility.
- Support for loading table with columns using reserved words.
- Fix mapping for TIME(0) to DT_STR SSIS datatype.
- Can display table name more than 30 characters correctly.
- Support for block mode and set as default mode.
- Expose TD_SPOOLMODE for TPT Export for faster extracts.
- Support for Extended Object Names(EON), which allow UNICODE object names in the Data Dictionary tables.
- Adding new datatypes (TD_PERIOD_DATE, TD_PERIOD_TIME and TD_NUMBER)
You’ll find details of the enhancements and downloads at: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=44582
I got an email the other day from Sean and Jen at Midnight DBA (www.midnightdba.com) about their new tool Minion for managing index rebuilds and fragmentation:
You can find details of Minion here: http://www.MidnightSQL.com/Minion
With these tools, they have been a little more ambitious in some ways than the tools provided by Ola Hallengren (https://ola.hallengren.com/) that have been our favourite tools for this work. I quite liked many of the concepts they have put into the tool. It still feels a bit version-1.0-ish to me but shows lots of promise. I liked the way that it’s all set up with a single script. I would, however, like to see more error handling, etc. in that script. For example, you should be able to run it twice without errors. With the script I looked at, that’s not possible.
I liked the way they are providing some capture of details from sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats.
For both this tool, and for Ola’s tool, I wish there was more focus on the index usage stats. Rather than basing decisions about rebuilding or reorganizing indexes based only on fragmentation level, I’d like to see details of how the indexes are used (ie: user seeks vs user scans) playing a much larger role in deciding the operations to be performed. Overuse of reindexing is a primary cause of bloated logs, log shipping failures, mirrors that fall behind, etc.
Regardless, it’s great to see a new entrant in this area. I encourage you to check it out, see what you think, and more importantly, provide feedback to them. Sean has recorded a video demo of the product which is also available at the site.
There was a question this morning on the SQL Down Under mailing list about how to determine the Windows groups for a given login.
That’s actually easy for a sysadmin login, as they have IMPERSONATE permission for other logins/users.
Here is an example procedure:
When I execute it on my system this way:
It returns the following:
Note that the Usage column could also return “DENY ONLY” or “AUTHENTICATOR”.
As most websites do, we collect analytics on the people visiting our site http://www.sqldownunder.com
I thought it might be interesting to share the breakdown of visitors to our site. Keep in mind that we have a primarily Microsoft-oriented audience. Enjoy!
No surprise on the native languages:
Country breakdown reflects the amount of local traffic we have for instructor-led courses. Most others are podcast listeners:
We first noticed Chrome slightly outstripping IE a while back but recently, it’s changed a lot. I suspect that IE11 will have been as issue here:
No surprises on the operating systems but Linux continues to disappear from our clients. It used to be higher:
The big change has been in mobile operating systems. It’s the first time that iOS has only managed 50%. It used to be 82% for us:
We’re also seeing a shift in screen resolutions:
And this is the mix of where our site visitors come from:
I had the pleasure of recording another SQL Down Under show today.
Show 64 features Microsoft Azure DocumentDB product group member discussing Azure DocumentDB and what SQL Server DBAs and developers need to know about it.
JSON-based storage has been one of the highest rated requests for enhancements to SQL Server. While we haven’t got those enhancements yet, DocumentDB nicely fills a gap between NoSQL databases (I use the term loosely ) and relational databases.
You’ll find the show here: http://www.sqldownunder.com/Podcasts
When I installed CU4 for SQL Server 2014, I started to receive an error in SSMS (SQL Server Management Studio) every time I connected to a database server:
It was interesting that it was a type that wasn’t being found in Microsoft.SqlServer.SqlEnum. I presumed it was a problem with a type being missing in that DLL and that I must have had an older one.
Turns out that the problem was with the Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo.dll.
The product team told me that “bad” DLL versions were pushed out by the first released version of SSDT-BI for VS2013. All was working fine though until I applied CU4; then the errors started.
While the correct file version was 12.0.2430.0, and that was the one I had in the folder, the issue seems to actually relate to the Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo.dll, not to the SqlEnum dll. For some reason the installer didn’t correctly replace the previous entry in the GAC. It was still a 12.0.2299.1 version.
What I ended up having to do was to use ProcessExplorer to locate the dependencies of the ssms.exe process, then find the version of Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo.dll that was being loaded. I renamed it to stop it being loaded and rebooted. Then I found I still had the error and there was another location that it loaded it from. Again I renamed it and rebooted. Finally the error said that it couldn’t find the file at all.
At this point, I did a Repair of the Shared Features on “SQL Server (x64)” from “Programs and Features”, then deinstalled CU4, rebooted, then reinstalled CU4.
And now it seems to work ok. (Although it did nuke the previous entries from the connection dialog in SSMS)
Hope that helps someone.
It’s great to see that the Connect site leading to fixes in the product.
I was really pleased when SQL Server Data Tools for BI appeared for Visual Studio 2013. What I wasn’t pleased about where a number of UI issues that came with that version.
In particular, there was a problem with previewing Reporting Services reports. If I create a new report project, add a blank report, and drag on a text box:
Note that when I clicked the Preview button, the following appeared:
It appears that the preview is provided by a program called PreviewProcessingService.exe that I presume was meant to be launched on-demand in the background. If you closed the window, an error appeared in your preview. If you minimized it, you could happily ignore if from that point on.
I reported it in the Connect site, and am happy to see today that a new KB article appeared with a fix for it.
What the KB 2986460 article provides is a link to a new downloadable version of SSDT-BI for VS2013:
When the article first appeared, I downloaded the version immediately. It did not fix the problem. Unfortunately, the KB article appeared one week before the download was updated. If you downloaded it before and it did not fix the problem, unfortunately you will need to download it again. Here are the file properties of the version with the fix:
Be forewarned that the fix is a complete replacement that is 1GB in size:
It would be great if they can get to the point of patching these programs without the need for complete downloads but I’m very pleased to see it appear regardless.
Over the last year, I’ve been delivering a number of partner enablement training sessions for Microsoft. They target the changes in SQL Server 2014 and also provide an introduction to Power BI.
During the sessions for day two, I have been getting the attendees to set up a high availability environment in Azure, with a Windows Server 2012 R2 domain controller and a couple of SQL Server 2014 Enterprise member servers. This process basically involves:
- Create the virtual network
- Create the cloud service
- Create and configure the domain controller VM and a fileshare
- Create and configure the SQL Server 2014 VMs
- Create a windows cluster for the three machines
- Configure SQL Server Availability Groups
- Configure an availability group listener that connects via the cloud service
That spread over three labs that took about two hours in total. It’s a good learning exercise because it gets you to understand every step along the way.
However, if you just want this type of setup created very quickly, there’s now a much easier way to do it within minutes. The SQL Server team have created a template that already includes all these options. When I first went looking for it, I couldn’t find it in the templates list:
I was still using the old portal. I needed to look in the new portal. You can get from the old portal to the new one by this link in the top right-hand corner. You need to click the little person icon, then choose from the menu:
In the new portal however, it’s easy to find:
I’d encourage you to try it to see how it simplifies the process.
By the way, if you are a Microsoft Partner and want to attend one of the upcoming sessions (in Melbourne, Perth, and Sydney), ping your partner contacts and find out if you can attend. I’d love to see you there.
There were a number of great announcements from Scott Guthrie today: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/azure-sql-databases-api-management-media-services-websites-role-based-access-control-and-more
One that particularly caught my eye was a subtle change to the billing for Azure SQL Database. Databases used to be billed at a daily charge.
While this might not have seemed a big deal, the only way to create a transactionally-consistent backup of the database was to first copy it using CREATE DATABASE AS COPY OF original database, then to use the database export functions on the copy. The export needed to be done on the copy (not on the original) as it just copied the data in each table, one table at a time.
If you did this operation once per day, you would have doubled the database costs. I have a customer who wanted to create 3 copies a day of 3,000 databases. That would have meant paying for 12,000 databases.
I’m glad to see that sense has prevailed on this. With the new billing option, this customer would now pay for the 3,000 databases for 24 hours a day, and 3 hours per day of additional databases, for an effective equivalent cost of 3,375 databases. That’s a big step forward from paying 12,000 databases. It’s enough of a change that it might make the project workable where it was not workable before.
The new arrangement is much more “cloudy” and in line with how other Azure services are charged. It’s very welcome thanks Microsoft!
Many customers want to install Books Online (BOL) when working with SQL Server. Generally I always think it’s a good idea.
Not all environments though, allow external connectivity for the systems where the clients want to install BOL.
A friend of mine Rob Sanders documented how to install BOL in an offline method a while back:
The problem with this was that the T-SQL Reference documentation was not included in the download for offline installation. Given the T-SQL language reference was the major reason that most people wanted to install BOL, it all seemed quite pointless.
I got the good news this week from Jeff Gollnick in the documentation team that the August release now includes the T-SQL language reference and that it’s available here:
That’s great news.
One of the things I’ve been keeping an eye on for quite a while now is the development of the Azure Search system.
While it’s not a full replacement for the full-text indexing service in SQL Server on-premises as yet, it’s a really, really good start.
Liam Cavanagh, Pablo Castro and the team have done a great job bringing this to the preview stage and I suspect it could be quite popular. I was very impressed by how they incorporated quite a bit of feedback I gave them early on, and I’m sure that others involved would have felt the same.
There are two tiers at present. One is a free tier and has shared resources; the other is currently $125/month and has reserved resources. I would like to see another tier between these two, much the same way that Azure websites work. If you have any feedback on this, now would be a good time to make it known.
In the meantime, given there is a free tier, there’s no excuse to not get out and try it. You’ll find details of it here: http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/services/search/
I’ll be posting more info about this service, and showing examples of it during the upcoming months.
I've been taking a look at some of the 3rd party tools for SQL Server. Today, I looked at DBForge Studio for SQL Server from the team at DevArt.
Installation was smooth. I did find it odd that it defaults to SQL authentication, not to Windows but either works fine.
I like the way they have followed the SQL Server Management Studio visual layout. That will make the product familiar to existing SQL Server Management Studio users.
I was keen to see what the database diagram tools are like. I found that the layouts generated where quite good, and certainly superior to the built-in SQL Server ones in SSMS. I didn't find any easy way to just add all tables to the diagram though. (That might just be me). One thing I did like was that it doesn't get confused when you have role playing dimensions. Multiple foreign key relationships between two tables display sensibly, unlike with the standard SQL Server version.
It was pleasing to see a printing option in the diagramming tool.
I found the database comparison tool worked quite well. There are a few UI things that surprised me (like when you add a new connection to a database, it doesn't select the one you just added by default) but generally it just worked as advertised, and the code that was generated looked ok.
I used the SQL query editor and found the code formatting to be quite fast and while I didn't mind the style that it used by default, it wasn't obvious to me how to change the format. In Tools/Options I found things that talked about Profiles but I wasn't sure if that's what I needed. The help file pointed me in the right direction and I created a new profile. It's a bit odd that when you create a new profile, that it doesn't put you straight into editing the profile. At first I didn't know what I'd done. But as soon as I chose to edit it, I found that a very good range of options were available.
When entering SQL code, the code completion options are quick but even though they are quite complete, one of the real challenges is in making them useful. Note in the following that while the options shown are correct, none are actually helpful:
The Query Profiler seemed to work quite well. I keep wondering when the version supplied with SQL Server will ever have options like finding the most expensive operators, etc. Now that it's deprecated, perhaps never but it's great to see the third party options like this one and like SQL Sentry's Plan Explorer having this functionality.
I didn't do much with the reporting options as I use SQL Server Reporting Services.
Overall, I was quite impressed with this product and given they have a free trial available, I think it's worth your time taking a look at it.