THE SQL Server Blog Spot on the Web

Welcome to SQLblog.com - The SQL Server blog spot on the web Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

The Bit Bucket (Greg Low): IDisposable

Ramblings of Greg Low (SQL Server MVP, MCM and Microsoft RD) - SQL Down Under

  • SQL Server 2012 Early Adoption Cook Book <- starting to be available

    I've been working on a team with Roger Doherty building parts of what's now become the SQL Server 2012 Early Adoption Cook Book.

    So, if you work on the bleeding edge of SQL Server and are keen to get your head around what's coming, this is a seriously good resource.

    Time to go and get it.

    The material is constructed as a large number of bite-sized pieces. Each presentation is about 15 minutes in length, and each demo is about 5 minutes. And there are lots of them.

    Look for recordings of these by the original authors on the Channel9 website soon too, followed by local in person presentations from Joe Homnick in many locations.

  • Happy new year 新年快乐 for my Chinese readers!

    If you have Chinese friends, it's time to say 新年快乐 to them!  (Xīnnián kuàilè -> Pronounced like Shin Nien Kwai Ler)

    They are welcoming in the year of the dragon.

  • Stored Procedure Contracts and Temp Tables

    Temp tables are visible within the scope where they are declared but also in sub-scopes. This means that you can declare a temp table in one stored procedure but access it in another stored procedure that is executed from within the first stored procedure.

    There are two reasons that people do this. One reason is basically sloppy code, a bit like having all your variables global in a high level programming language. But the more appropriate reason is to avoid the overhead of moving large amounts of data around, and because we only have READONLY table valued parameters.

    But I've never liked the idea of this type of access. It breaks normal coding rules on encapsulation. Nothing in the child procedure gives any clue that it expects the temp table to already be present. The code that accesses the temporary object could just as easily be a typo. Where this comes to light is when you try to use tools like SQL Server Data Tools (or previously a similar issue with DataDude). How can a utility that analyzes your code know if that reference is valid or just an unresolved reference?

    I've previously posted about the need for stored procedures to have contracts: http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/greg_low/archive/2010/01/20/stored-procedure-contracts-return-values.aspx

    This seems to be another case where a contract might help. The fact that a procedure depends upon the pre-existence of a temporary object should be discoverable from the metadata of the procedure. Perhaps something like this:

    CREATE PROCEDURE ChildProc

    REQUIRES #SomeTempTable SomeTableType

    AS

    ...

    or if the temp table isn't based on a table type, just syntax similar to a table valued function where you could say:

    CREATE PROCEDURE ChildProc

    REQUIRES #SomeTempTable TABLE (Table definition here)

    AS

    ...

    I'd love to hear what you think.

    PS: I've added a Connect item on this. Please vote if you agree: https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/716565/sql-server-should-allow-declarative-specification-of-temp-tables-used-as-parameters

  • SQL Server Upgrade Advisor should check Database db_compat levels, not server version

    We have a very common customer scenario where the customer decides to upgrade to a new version (in this case let's say SQL Server 2012). They run upgrade advisor and note that there are a whole lot of problems. They think "Hey that's way too much to deal with right now. I don't have time".

    So they don't deal with them. They upgrade the server to 2012 but leave their db_compat level at a lower level with the intention of dealing with the problems later.

    But when they go to run the upgrade advisor later, to find the issues that they need to resolve before changing db_compat level to 2012, it tells them that they can no longer use it because their server is already at 2012. How can they now check what needs to be changed? They also cannot now reattach their databases to an earlier version server, as they've been upgraded to 2012 structure.

    I believe that upgrade advisor should check db_compat levels, not server versions, before refusing to run. If you agree, you know what to do. Vote once, vote often:

    https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/715400/upgrade-advisor-should-check-database-db-compat-level-not-server-version

  • New SQL Down Under Podcast with Roger Doherty on SQL Server 2012

    Well it's been a while since I've posted up a new podcast. (I know, I know).

    But I've just started a new series for SQL Server 2012. First out of the gate is Roger Doherty (Senior Program Manager in the SQL Server team) with an overview of all the key SQL Server 2012 pillars and enhancements.

    You'll find it here:

    http://www.sqldownunder.com/PreviousShows/tabid/98/Default.aspx

    Enjoy!

  • SQL Azure DB size limit increased to 150GB

    Nice to see the increase in maximum database size on SQL Azure kicked up to 150GB.

    In most enterprises I go into, there are a few databases that wouldn't fit but now the vast majority of databases would fit in SQL Azure.

    Also included in the November release are federations and an updated management portal.

    More info here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/ff602419.aspx

  • SSIS: The package failed to load due to error 0xC0010014

    Over the years, I've seen several causes of this error in SQL Server Integration Services but today I came across another one.

    You can get this error if you've used 3rd party components (particularly data sources) and the licensing for those components has expired.

    Hope that helps someone sometime.

  • Avoiding connection timeouts on first connection to LocalDB edition of SQL Server Express

    When you first make a connection to the new LocalDB edition of SQL Server Express, the system files, etc. that are required for a new version are spun up. (The system files such as the master database files, etc. end up in C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances\LocalDBApp1) That can take a while on a slower machine, so this means that the default connection timeout of 30 seconds (in most client libraries) could be exceeded.

    To avoid this hit on the first connection, you can create the required instance of LocalDB beforehand using the SqlLocalDB.exe utility, like this:

    <path to binaries>\SqlLocalDB.exe create InstanceName

    You can also specify the required version of SQL Server and ask to start the instance like this:

    <path to binaries>\SqlLocalDB.exe create InstanceName 11.0 -s

    Your application should then connect quickly, even on the first connection.

    SqlLocalDB documentation is starting to appear now. Documentation on the utility is here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212961(v=sql.110).aspx.

  • FIX: A network error occurred during SQL Server Native Client installation

    One of the things that I have been pestering the SQL team to do is to name their updates according to what is contained in them. For example, instead of just:

    sqlncli.msi 

    What I'd prefer is that the file was called something like:

    SQLServerNativeClient2k8SP1CU3x64.msi

    So I normally rename them as soon as I receive them, to avoid confusion in future. However, today I found that doing so caused me a problem. After renaming the file, and installing it, the installation failed with the error:

    "A network error occurred while reading from the file: C:\temp\sqlncli.msi"

    A quick inspection of the error shows that the code in the msi is looking for the file by name. Renaming the file back to the original name makes it install ok. It's a pity that the person coding the installer didn't pick up the name of the file programmatically, rather than hard-coding it.

    Anyway, hope that helps someone that sees this error.

  • MVP Deep Dives volume 2 is now published!

    It's great to see that volume 2 of MVP Deep Dives is now available and will be distributed at the PASS summit next week. I'm really sad that I won't be at the book signing next week but I'd encourage you all to get along, order a copy and have it signed.

    A huge thanks has to go to Kalen Delaney for her management of this project and a big thanks to my fellow editors Louis Davidson, Brad McGehee, Paul Nielsen, Paul Randal, and Kimberly Tripp for their efforts. A special mention for Paul Nielsen whose ideas and spirit around volume 1 that have continued into this new volume.

    And of course, a really big thank you to all the authors that gave their time to make this possible.

    Please buy a copy and help us to help Operation Smile. You'll find the book's website here: http://www.manning.com/delaney/ 

    While you're at it, why not send an extra donation to Operation Smile: https://secure.operationsmile.org/site/Donation2?df_id=10380&10380.donation=form1

  • September Edition of SolidQ Journal: More free SQL goodness

    Great to see that our team has the September edition of the SolidQ Journal out the door. I was interested to see Fernando Guerrero's editorial regarding the recent BUILD conference in Anaheim and the implications for the industry.

    • Laurent Martin is a new guest author. Laurent wrote about static relational interval trees.
    • Gilberto Zampatti continues his series about using PowerShell to configure SharePoint service applications.
    • Rushabh Mehta continues his series about creating an SSIS management framework.
    • Paras Doshi has provided the final part of the series on tuning SQL Azure.
    • Pablo Ahumada shows how to design a dashboard using PerformancePoint Services.
    • Salvador Ramos has written about how to use Excel in ETL processes.
    • And Herbert Albert and Gianluca Hotz continue their wonderful series on PowerShell. This time it's on how to use PowerShell to automate tasks related to Excel.

    Once again, it's a good month and you'll find the journal here: http://www.solidq.com/sqj.

  • Denali: Improved T-SQL Query Optimization

    Part of the value in the ongoing evolution of the T-SQL language is that we are moving further and further towards being declarative rather than prescriptive ie: we are able to tell SQL Server what we want, rather than how to do it. Over time, that raises more and more possibilities for the optimizer to work with us to achieve a better outcome.

    For example, note the following query against the AdventureWorksDW database:

    SELECT rs.ProductKey, rs.OrderDateKey, rs.SalesOrderNumber,

           rs.OrderDateKey - (SELECT TOP(1) prev.OrderDateKey

                              FROM dbo.FactResellerSales AS prev

                              WHERE rs.ProductKey = prev.ProductKey

                              AND prev.OrderDateKey <= rs.OrderDateKey

                              AND prev.SalesOrderNumber < rs.SalesOrderNumber

                              ORDER BY prev.OrderDateKey DESC,

                                      prev.SalesOrderNumber DESC)

                    AS DaysSincePrevOrder

    FROM dbo.FactResellerSales AS rs

    ORDER BY rs.ProductKey, rs.OrderDateKey, rs.SalesOrderNumber;

    In this query, I'm trying to include details of how long it was since the previous order, beside the details of the current order. Note the option that the LAG operator now provides:

    SELECT ProductKey, OrderDateKey, SalesOrderNumber,

           OrderDateKey - LAG(OrderDateKey)

                             OVER (PARTITION BY ProductKey

                                    ORDER BY OrderDateKey, SalesOrderNumber)

                    AS DaysSincePrevOrder

    FROM dbo.FactResellerSales AS rs

    ORDER BY ProductKey, OrderDateKey, SalesOrderNumber;

    Also note how much more elegant the code is but more importantly, look at the difference in optimization:

     

    This is great work from the T-SQL and engine teams. I encourage you to get out and try the new Windowing functions in Denali CTP3.

  • Denali: Note the small but important things in SSIS

    With SQL Server, there often seems to be an over-emphasis on the items that provide bullet points for the marketing brochure. Yet, small but useful changes to the product can make a more profound impact on DBAs/developers than the new items that are highlighted by those bullet points.

    One of the things I loved about Reporting Services in SQL Server 2008 R2 is the amount of focus they provided on ease of use. In particular, the addition of data bars, lookup functions, pagination control, rendering targets in expressions, domain scope, etc. made a huge difference to anyone that really needs to build reports.

    For Denali, Integration Services has me similarly excited. I've just completed prepping and presenting a session on the Denali enhancements to SSIS (and on the introduction of Data Quality Services) for TechEd Australia. It was interesting to note, though, that the biggest reactions I received from the crowd were for the "little" improvements, not for the big ticket items. Some of the best examples of these are:

    • Zoom control, general UI improvements and the Fit to Window
    • Improvements around the display of precedence labels (great for those who are color blind and struggle with the standard red/green/blue)
    • Toolbox groupings
    • Ease of integrating new items into the Toolbox
    • Reliability and performance improvements around Merge/Merge Join

    And there are many more. The two biggest woohoo moments though, came for:

    • Multi-level undo and redo
    • Remapping work that has been done in the data flow (remapping GUI is great but the way that so many mapping issues are automatically fixed is awesome)

    I want to congratulate the team on spending time making these type of "less visible" improvements.

  • Do you still sharpen your knives?

    We end up staying in Sydney several times per year, either for training or mentoring/consulting work. When we do, one of the hotels that we really like is the Westin. I would find it hard though, to list all the reasons why I like it. (There are some things I don't like about it too but that's a topic for another day).

    But one of the things that has always surprised me, each and every time I eat breakfast there, is how sharp the knives are. Clearly, someone must be assigned to sharpen them, or they replace them very regularly (unlikely). Alternately, one of the staff members might have been passionate about it and it was an individual thing but we stayed about 160 nights in hotels last year and I can tell you that most hotels (big or small) don't bother doing this.

    Today at breakfast, I noticed that the knives weren't sharp. Same thing happened last time. I can't help but thinking that this might be one little tell-tale sign of some belt-tightening in the running costs of the hotel. If it was an individual effort, perhaps that person has just left.

    However, it got me wondering about what impact these little things have ie: the little things that companies do but that would never appear on a brochure. Do you have little things that you do for your customers that are a bit unique and that your customers appreciate without telling you? Do you still do them? Do you still sharpen your knives?

  • More things I learned today: EXEC AS USER on dynamic SQL

    I really liked the addition of the WITH EXECUTE AS clause when defining stored procedures and functions, to change the execution context, just for the duration of the stored procedure or function. For example:

    CREATE PROC SomeSchema.SomeProc

    WITH EXECUTE AS USER = 'Fred'

    AS

    ... 

    I'd also used the EXEC AS clause to temporarily change my execution context during testing. For example:

    EXEC AS USER = 'Fred';

    -- Try some code here while running as Fred

    REVERT;

    But what I didn't realize is that you can set the execution context for a single execution like this:

    EXEC ('Some command to be executed as Fred') AS USER = 'Fred';

    Back in SQL 2000, I made a big effort to read all of Books Online. The more I read of the current BOL, the more I think I need to do that again. (Mind you, I'm not sure that that's even possible any more. I think they're writing/modifying it faster than I have time to read it).

More Posts Next page »
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems
  Privacy Statement