<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Buck Woody : SQL Server, Best Practices, Developer</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/tags/SQL+Server/Best+Practices/Developer/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: SQL Server, Best Practices, Developer</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Use Those Schemas, People!</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2010/05/18/use-those-schemas-people.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:39:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:25246</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/comments/25246.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/commentrss.aspx?PostID=25246</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Database Schemas are just containers – they aren’t users or anything else – think of a sub-directory on the hard drive. In early versions of SQL Server we “hid” schemas, placing all objects under “dbo”, which gave the erroneous perception that Schemas are users. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In SQL Server 2005, we “un-hid” or re-introduced schemas within the database. Users can have a default schema (a place where their new objects go), you can add new schemas and transfer objects between them, and they have many other benefits.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;But I still see a lot of applications, developed by shops I know as well as vendors, that don’t make use of a Schema. Everything is piled under dbo. I completely understand this – since permissions can be granted to a schema, they feel a lot like a user, so it’s just easier not to worry about both users and schemas when you create a database. But if you’ll use them properly you can make your application more understandable and portable.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;You should at least take a few minutes and read more about them – you owe it to your users: &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190387.aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190387.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=25246" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/tags/Best+Practices/default.aspx">Best Practices</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/tags/DBA/default.aspx">DBA</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/tags/Design/default.aspx">Design</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/tags/Developer/default.aspx">Developer</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category></item></channel></rss>