<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Aaron Bertrand</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/default.aspx</link><description>Aaron is a senior consultant for &lt;a target=_blank href=http://www.sqlsentry.net /&gt;SQL Sentry, Inc.&lt;/a&gt;, makers of performance monitoring and event management software for SQL Server, Analysis Services, and Windows.  He has been blogging here at sqlblog.com since 2006, focusing on manageability, performance, and new features; has been a &lt;a target=_blank href=http://mvp.support.microsoft.com&gt;Microsoft MVP&lt;/a&gt; since 1997; tweets as &lt;a target=_blank href=http://twitter.com/AaronBertrand&gt;@AaronBertrand&lt;/a&gt;; and speaks frequently at user group meetings and &lt;a target=_blank href=http://sqlsaturday.com&gt;SQL Saturday&lt;/a&gt; events.
 </description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Upgrading to SQL Server 2012 with Lock Pages in Memory</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/02/06/upgrading-to-sql-server-2012-with-lock-pages-in-memory.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40107</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/40107.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=40107</wfw:commentRss><description>During SQL Server 2012 RC0 setup (specifically when upgrading), you may have noticed upgrade rules regarding Lock Pages in Memory (LPIM): However, for most folks, these rules always pass, whether or not they are actually using LPIM. I wanted to run a...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/02/06/upgrading-to-sql-server-2012-with-lock-pages-in-memory.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40107" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/setup/default.aspx">setup</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/trace+flags/default.aspx">trace flags</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/lock+pages+in+memory/default.aspx">lock pages in memory</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/x64/default.aspx">x64</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/x86/default.aspx">x86</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2012/default.aspx">SQL Server 2012</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/awe/default.aspx">awe</category></item><item><title>Bad Habits to Kick : Thinking a WHILE loop isn't a CURSOR</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/26/the-fallacy-that-a-while-loop-isn-t-a-cursor.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:41223</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>17</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/41223.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=41223</wfw:commentRss><description>I see a lot of people suggest while loops instead of cursors in situations where row-based processing is required (or, at least, where folks think that row-based processing is required). Sometimes the justification is that constructing a while loop is...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/26/the-fallacy-that-a-while-loop-isn-t-a-cursor.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=41223" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/best+practices/default.aspx">best practices</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/cursors/default.aspx">cursors</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/bad+habits/default.aspx">bad habits</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/while+loops/default.aspx">while loops</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2012 : The "Launch Date" is not what you think it is</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/23/sql-server-2012-the-launch-date-is-not-what-you-think-it-is.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:41248</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>18</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/41248.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=41248</wfw:commentRss><description>I see a lot of people getting really excited. There is a "virtual launch event" for SQL Server 2012 being held on March 7, 2012. You can read more about the event at http://sqlserverlaunch.com/ . Let me throw out a dose of reality: if you are not on a...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/23/sql-server-2012-the-launch-date-is-not-what-you-think-it-is.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=41248" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+11/default.aspx">SQL Server 11</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+_2600_quot_3B00_Denali_2600_quot_3B00_/default.aspx">SQL Server &amp;quot;Denali&amp;quot;</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/RTM/default.aspx">RTM</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2012/default.aspx">SQL Server 2012</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/Launch/default.aspx">Launch</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/Release/default.aspx">Release</category></item><item><title>Bad Habits to Kick : Using AS instead of = for column aliases</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/23/bad-habits-to-kick-using-as-instead-of-for-column-aliases.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:41212</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>59</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/41212.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=41212</wfw:commentRss><description>This one is quite subjective, and I'm sure I will face plenty of opposition - not only because it's a preference thing and many people are married to their preferences, but also because it violates the strict interpretation of the standard. Personally,...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/23/bad-habits-to-kick-using-as-instead-of-for-column-aliases.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=41212" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/best+practices/default.aspx">best practices</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/bad+habits/default.aspx">bad habits</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/formatting/default.aspx">formatting</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/coding+conventions/default.aspx">coding conventions</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/readability/default.aspx">readability</category></item><item><title>Blog Post #500 : 2011, a year in review</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/20/blog-post-500-2011-in-review.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:41195</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/41195.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=41195</wfw:commentRss><description>My favorite blog post Picking favorites is never easy. While I definitely feel like I had some more thought-provoking, controversial and laborious blog posts, my favorite would have to be my summary of 18456 errors: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/01/14/sql-server-v-next-denali-additional-states-for-error-18456.aspx...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/20/blog-post-500-2011-in-review.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=41195" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/goals/default.aspx">goals</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/post+_2300_500/default.aspx">post #500</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/year+in+review/default.aspx">year in review</category></item><item><title>New cumulative Updates for SQL Server 2008 SP2/SP3 are available!</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/20/new-cumulative-updates-for-sql-server-2008-sp2-sp3-are-available.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:41194</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/41194.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=41194</wfw:commentRss><description>On Monday, I completely missed that the SQL Server Release Services team published two cumulative updates for SQL Server 2008. I'd blame jury duty, but that didn't start until Tuesday, and only lasted two days. Well, better late than never. Cumulative...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/20/new-cumulative-updates-for-sql-server-2008-sp2-sp3-are-available.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=41194" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/cumulative+updates/default.aspx">cumulative updates</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/patches/default.aspx">patches</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/service+pack+3/default.aspx">service pack 3</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/hotfixes/default.aspx">hotfixes</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/service+pack+2/default.aspx">service pack 2</category></item><item><title>A quick reaction to the PASS board appointments</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/16/a-quick-reaction-to-the-pass-board-appointments.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:41070</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>33</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/41070.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=41070</wfw:commentRss><description>First of all, I want to congratulate both Kendal van Dyke ( @SQLDBA ) and James Rowland-Jones ( @jrowlandjones ) on their recent appointment to the PASS Board of Directors . I have no doubt they will go above and beyond to fulfill their duties and represent...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/16/a-quick-reaction-to-the-pass-board-appointments.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=41070" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/PASS/default.aspx">PASS</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/appointments/default.aspx">appointments</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/BoD/default.aspx">BoD</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/Board+of+Directors/default.aspx">Board of Directors</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx">elections</category></item><item><title>T-SQL Tuesday #26 : Second Chances</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/10/t-sql-tuesday-26-second-chances.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40895</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/40895.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=40895</wfw:commentRss><description>This month's T-SQL Tuesday is being hosted by Dave Howard ( @DaveH0ward ), and the topic is " Second Chances ." What he's letting us do is look back at all the previous T-SQL Tuesdays and pick a topic that we missed or maybe thought we needed another...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/10/t-sql-tuesday-26-second-chances.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40895" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/T-SQL+Tuesday/default.aspx">T-SQL Tuesday</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/data+presentation/default.aspx">data presentation</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/timezones/default.aspx">timezones</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/UTC/default.aspx">UTC</category></item><item><title>Connect Digest : 2012-01-09</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/09/connect-digest-2012-01-09.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40556</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/40556.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=40556</wfw:commentRss><description>Hide databases from users who shouldn't be able to see them This is a long-standing request from Erland Sommarskog which I've highlighted in previous digests. But the underlying problem keeps coming up in multiple venues, so I thought it would be good...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/09/connect-digest-2012-01-09.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40556" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/Connect/default.aspx">Connect</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/DMVs/default.aspx">DMVs</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/security/default.aspx">security</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/intellisense/default.aspx">intellisense</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/parallelism/default.aspx">parallelism</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/MAXDOP/default.aspx">MAXDOP</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/Contained+databases/default.aspx">Contained databases</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/passwords/default.aspx">passwords</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2012/default.aspx">SQL Server 2012</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/show_5F00_statistics/default.aspx">show_statistics</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/CHECKDB/default.aspx">CHECKDB</category></item><item><title>Comparing multiple plans in SQL Sentry Plan Explorer</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/06/comparing-multiple-plans-in-sql-sentry-plan-explorer.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40864</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/40864.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=40864</wfw:commentRss><description>I’ve seen the question a few times now: “How do I compare two plans side-by-side in Plan Explorer?” Management Studio allows you to view multiple graphical plans that are visible simultaneously, either by generating plans for every statement in a batch,...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2012/01/06/comparing-multiple-plans-in-sql-sentry-plan-explorer.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40864" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SSMS/default.aspx">SSMS</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/management+studio/default.aspx">management studio</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Sentry/default.aspx">SQL Sentry</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/execution+plans/default.aspx">execution plans</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/Plan+Explorer/default.aspx">Plan Explorer</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/Query+plans/default.aspx">Query plans</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/graphical+plans/default.aspx">graphical plans</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/showplan/default.aspx">showplan</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Sentry+Plan+Explorer/default.aspx">SQL Sentry Plan Explorer</category></item><item><title>Connect Digest : 2011-12-20</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/12/20/connect-digest-2011-12-15.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:39976</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/39976.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=39976</wfw:commentRss><description>Make SSMS start faster A couple of years ago, I blogged about some ways to make Management Studio start faster . With the latest builds of SQL Server 2012, it seems to be slower than ever, at least when starting SSMS for the first time after a reboot...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/12/20/connect-digest-2011-12-15.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=39976" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/Connect/default.aspx">Connect</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/slipstream/default.aspx">slipstream</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/bugs/default.aspx">bugs</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/suggestions/default.aspx">suggestions</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/temporary+views/default.aspx">temporary views</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/truncate/default.aspx">truncate</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/defrag/default.aspx">defrag</category></item><item><title>New cumulative updates for SQL Server 2008 R2 are available!</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/12/20/new-cumulative-updates-for-sql-server-2008-r2-are-available.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40554</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/40554.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=40554</wfw:commentRss><description>Microsoft has just released cumulative updates for both SQL Server 2008 R2 branches - RTM and Service Pack 1. SQL Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 Cumulative Update #4 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2633146/ Build number is 10.50.2796 Contains 53 fixes...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/12/20/new-cumulative-updates-for-sql-server-2008-r2-are-available.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40554" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/cumulative+updates/default.aspx">cumulative updates</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/patches/default.aspx">patches</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SP1/default.aspx">SP1</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/hotfixes/default.aspx">hotfixes</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008+R2/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008 R2</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/RTM/default.aspx">RTM</category></item><item><title>T-SQL Tuesday #25 : T-SQL Tips 'n' Tricks</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/12/13/t-sql-tuesday-25-t-sql-tips-n-tricks.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:40359</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/40359.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=40359</wfw:commentRss><description>This month's T-SQL Tuesday is being hosted by Allen White ( @SQLRunr ) and is about sharing your T-SQL tips and tricks . Since I know many people will share their T-SQL magic and wizardry, I thought I would share a couple of productivity tips - so still...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/12/13/t-sql-tuesday-25-t-sql-tips-n-tricks.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40359" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SSMS/default.aspx">SSMS</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/management+studio/default.aspx">management studio</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2012/default.aspx">SQL Server 2012</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/productivity/default.aspx">productivity</category></item><item><title>Connect Digest : 2011-12-01</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/12/01/connect-digest-2011-10-15.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:38648</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/38648.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=38648</wfw:commentRss><description>Where is my graphical ShowPlan? Many of you on SQL Server 2008 R2 are experiencing a major annoyance with SSMS since installing service pack 1 - when clicking a plan from grid results, you get raw XML instead of the graphical plan. I wrote about this...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/12/01/connect-digest-2011-10-15.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=38648" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SSMS/default.aspx">SSMS</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/management+studio/default.aspx">management studio</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/execution+plans/default.aspx">execution plans</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/evaluation+edition/default.aspx">evaluation edition</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/CASE/default.aspx">CASE</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/showplan/default.aspx">showplan</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/plans/default.aspx">plans</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/short+circuit/default.aspx">short circuit</category></item><item><title>Cumulative Updates for SQL Server 2008 SP2/SP3 are available</title><link>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/11/22/cumulative-updates-for-sql-server-2008-sp2-sp3-are-available.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:39939</guid><dc:creator>AaronBertrand</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/comments/39939.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/commentrss.aspx?PostID=39939</wfw:commentRss><description>Very early this morning, Microsoft released two new cumulative updates for the SQL Server 2008 platform. Cumulative Update #7 for SQL Server 2008 Service Pack 2 If SELECT @@VERSION is between 10.00.4000 and 10.00.4322 KB article is KB #2617148 There are...(&lt;a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2011/11/22/cumulative-updates-for-sql-server-2008-sp2-sp3-are-available.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://sqlblog.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=39939" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/cumulative+updates/default.aspx">cumulative updates</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/patches/default.aspx">patches</category><category domain="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/tags/hotfixes/default.aspx">hotfixes</category></item></channel></rss>
